The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Amphetamine Paired With Physical Therapy Accelerates Motor Recovery After Stroke: Further Evidence
Abstract
Background and Purpose In animal models of brain injury, administration of numerous pharmaceuticals is reported to facilitate functional recovery. However, only drugs that increase the release of norepinephrine have been shown to promote recovery when administered late (days to weeks) after injury. To determine whether these findings were applicable to humans, we administered the norepinephrine stimulant dextroamphetamine, paired with physical therapy, to hemiplegic stroke patients. Methods Ten hemiplegic patients who suffered an acute ischemic infarction were entered between days 16 and 30 after onset and randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg of dextroamphetamine or a placebo orally every fourth day for 10 sessions paired with physical therapy. The Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale was used at baseline, within each session, and for 12 months after onset as the dependent measure. Confounding medications such as α-adrenergic antagonists or agonists were excluded in all subjects. Results Although there were no differences between the groups at baseline ( P =.599), there was a significant ( P =.047) difference between the groups when the drug had been discontinued for 1 week and at the 12-month follow-up visit ( P =.047). Conclusions Administration of dextroamphetamine paired with physical therapy increased the rate and extent of motor recovery in a small group of hemiplegic stroke patients. These data support and extend previous findings of the facilitatory aspects of certain types of drugs on recovery from brain injury. The use of neuromodulation may allow the nervous system to adapt previously unused or alternative pathways to relevant external input.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline
Duncan, P. W., Zorowitz, R., Bates, B., Choi, J. Y., Glasberg, J. J., Graham, G. D., Katz, R. C., Lamberty, K., & Reker, D. (2005) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000180861.54180.ff · Cited by 1,046
A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke
Cramer, S. C., Nelles, G., Benson, R. R., Kaplan, J. D., Parker, R. A., Kwong, K. K., Kennedy, D. N., Finklestein, S. P., & Rosen, B. R. (1997) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.28.12.2518 · Cited by 1,019
Chollet, F., Tardy, J., Albucher, J.-F., Thalamas, C., Berard, E., Lamy, C., Bejot, Y., Deltour, S., Jaillard, A., Niclot, P., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70314-8 · Cited by 925
National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke.
Robinson, T. (2001) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pmj.77.906.286h · Cited by 608
Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex
Nudo, R. J., Plautz, E. J., & Frost, S. B. (2001) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.1104 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker-Batson, D., Smith, P., Curtis, S., Unwin, H., & Greenlee, R.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2254-2259
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2067300476
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amphetamine Paired With Physical Therapy Accelerates Motor Recovery After Stroke: Further Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.26.12.2254
- The paper
- Walker-Batson, D., Smith, P., Curtis, S., Unwin, H., & Greenlee, R. (1995). Amphetamine Paired With Physical Therapy Accelerates Motor Recovery After Stroke: Further Evidence. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.26.12.2254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.