The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oral Anticoagulants and Intracranial Hemorrhage: Facts and Hypotheses
Abstract
Background Intracranial hemorrhage is the most feared and lethal complication of oral anticoagulation. We review the frequency, predictors, and prognosis of this most common neurological complication of oral anticoagulation. Summary of Review Anticoagulation to conventional intensities increases the risk of intracranial hemorrhage 7- to 10-fold, to an absolute rate of nearly 1%/y for many stroke-prone patients. Most (70%) anticoagulant-related intracranial hemorrhages are intracerebral hematomas (approximately 60% are fatal); the bulk of the remainder are subdural hematomas. Predictors of anticoagulant-related intracerebral hematoma are advanced patient age, prior ischemic stroke, hypertension, and intensity of anticoagulation. In approximately half of anticoagulated patients with intracerebral hematoma the bleeding evolves slowly over 12 to 24 hours, and emergency reversal of anticoagulation is crucial. Conclusions Both patient factors and anticoagulation intensity importantly influence the rate of anticoagulation-related intracranial hemorrhage. Patient-related risk factors for this complication overlap with those for ischemic stroke. The risk/benefit equation of anticoagulation for elderly, stroke-prone patients is complex and differs from that for younger patients. The absolute rate reduction (not the relative risk reduction) of ischemic stroke by anticoagulation is the critical issue and must offset accentuation of often lethal brain hemorrhage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment
Laupacis, A., Sackett, D. L., & Roberts, R. S. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806303182605 · Cited by 1,681
Cited by
Broderick, J., Connolly, S., Feldmann, E., Hanley, D., Kase, C., Krieger, D., Mayberg, M., Morgenstern, L., Ogilvy, C. S., Vespa, P., et al. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.183689 · Cited by 1,125
Warfarin, hematoma expansion, and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage
Flibotte, J. J., Hagan, N., O’Donnell, J., Greenberg, S. M., & Rosand, J. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000138428.40673.83 · Cited by 632
Man-Son-Hing, M., Nichol, G., Lau, A., & Laupacis, A. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.7.677 · Cited by 538
Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke
Albers, G. W., Amarenco, P., Easton, J. D., Sacco, R. L., & Teal, P. (2004) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.483s · Cited by 466
Woo, D., Sauerbeck, L. R., Kissela, B. M., Khoury, J. C., Szaflarski, J. P., Gebel, J., Shukla, R., Pancioli, A. M., Jauch, E. C., Menon, A. G., et al. (2002) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000014774.88027.22 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, R. G., Boop, B. S., & Anderson, D. C.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1471-1477
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2031990245
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Anticoagulants and Intracranial Hemorrhage: Facts and Hypotheses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.26.8.1471
- The paper
- Hart, R. G., Boop, B. S., & Anderson, D. C. (1995). Oral Anticoagulants and Intracranial Hemorrhage: Facts and Hypotheses. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.26.8.1471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.