The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of the Risks of Stroke and Death Due to Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Abstract
Background and Purpose Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of carotid territory ischemic stroke ipsilateral to a recently symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. However, the benefit is limited by the risks of stroke and death associated with the operation. Although reported surgical risks vary enormously, there has been no systematic review of the published literature. Methods We performed a systematic review of mortality and the risk of stroke and/or death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in studies published since 1980. Results Fifty-one studies fulfilled our criteria. Overall mortality was 1.62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 1.9), and the risk of stroke and/or death was 5.64% (95% CI, 4.4 to 6.9). However, there was significant heterogeneity of risk of stroke and/or death ( P <.001). The risk varied systematically with the methods and the authorship of the study. The risk of stroke and/or death was highest in studies in which patients were assessed by a neurologist after surgery (7.7%; 95% CI, 5.0 to 10.2) and lowest in studies with a single author affiliated with a department of surgery (2.3%; 95% CI, 1.8 to 2.7). After correcting for study methodology, there was no temporal trend in the risk of stroke and/or death between 1980 and 1995. Conclusions The reported risks of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis show significantly greater variability than would be expected by chance. However, much of this variability can be accounted for by differences in methodology and authorship. The 5.6% overall risk of stroke and/or death is consistent with present guidelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108153250701 · Cited by 8,368
The cochrane database of systematic reviews
Geddes, J. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(96)90063-x · Cited by 5,989
Warlow, C. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-p · Cited by 3,237
Self-citationSystematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews
Dickersin, K., Scherer, R., & Lefebvre, C. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286 · Cited by 2,256
Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Mayberg, M. R. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470230047029 · Cited by 964
The Medical Review Article: State of the Science
MULROW, C. D. (1987) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485 · Cited by 856
Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Dennis, M., Burn, J., & Warlow, C. (1990) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.53.1.16 · Cited by 814
Self-citationMoore, W. S., Barnett, H. J. M., Beebe, H. G., Bernstein, E. F., Brener, B. J., Brott, T., Caplan, L. R., Day, A., Goldstone, J., Hobson, R. W., et al. (1995) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.26.1.188 · Cited by 545
The practice of carotid endarterectomy in a large metropolitan area.
Brott, T., & Thalinger, K. (1984) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.15.6.950 · Cited by 200
Cited by
External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”
Rothwell, P. M. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17670-8 · Cited by 2,544
Self-citationDissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Song, F., Parekh, Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Ryder, J., Sutton, A., Hing, C., Kwok, C., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta14080 · Cited by 1,039
Brott, T. G., Halperin, J. L., Abbara, S., Bacharach, J. M., Barr, J. D., Bush, R. L., Cates, C. U., Creager, M. A., Fowler, S. B., Friday, G., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.006 · Cited by 447
Reanalysis of the Final Results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial
Rothwell, P. M., Gutnikov, S. A., & Warlow, C. P. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000054671.71777.c7 · Cited by 434
Self-citationPublication and related biases.
Song, Eastwood, Gilbody, Duley, & Sutton (2000) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta4100 · Cited by 427
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothwell, P. M., Slattery, J., & Warlow, C. P.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 260-265
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1986987068
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review of the Risks of Stroke and Death Due to Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.27.2.260
- The paper
- Rothwell, P. M., Slattery, J., & Warlow, C. P. (1996). A Systematic Review of the Risks of Stroke and Death Due to Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.2.260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.