The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stroke Unit Treatment: Long-term Effects
Abstract
Background and Purpose We have previously shown that treatment in our combined acute and rehabilitation Stroke Unit improves outcome during the first year after onset of stroke compared with stroke patients treated in general wards. The aim of the present trial was to examine the long-term effects of the stroke unit care. Methods In a randomized controlled trial, 110 patients with symptoms and signs of an acute stroke were allocated to the Stroke Unit and 110 to general wards. No significant differences existed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The outcome after 5 years was measured by the proportion of patients at home, the proportion of patients in an institution, the mortality, and the functional state assessed by Barthel Index. Results After 5 years, 38 (34.5%) of the patients randomized to the Stroke Unit and 20 (18.2%) of the patients randomized to the general wards were at home ( P =.006). Sixty-five (59.1%) of the patients from the Stroke Unit and 78 (70.9%) of the patients from the general wards were dead ( P =.041), while 7 (6.4%) and 12 (10.9%), respectively, were in an institution (eg, nursing home) ( P =NS). Functional state was significantly better for patients treated in the Stroke Unit. Conclusions For the first time it is shown that stroke unit care improves long-term survival and functional state and increases the proportion of patients able to live at home 5 years after the stroke. Combined acute and rehabilitation stroke units appear to be an effective way of organizing treatment for acute stroke patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke
Collaboratio, S. U. T. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000197.pub2 · Cited by 1,314
Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B., & Lindeman, E. (2004) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2004-00282 · Cited by 727
National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke.
Robinson, T. (2001) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pmj.77.906.286h · Cited by 608
Treatment in a Combined Acute and Rehabilitation Stroke Unit: Which Aspects Are Most Important?
Indredavik, B., Bakke, F., Slørdahl, S. A., Rokseth, R., & Håheim, L. L. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.5.917 · Cited by 368
Self-citationFjærtoft, H., Rohweder, G., & Indredavik, B. (2011) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.110.601153 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Indredavik, B., Slørdahl, S. A., Bakke, F., Rokseth, R., & Håheim, L. L.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1861-1866
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2098805925
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stroke Unit Treatment: Long-term Effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.28.10.1861
- The paper
- Indredavik, B., Slørdahl, S. A., Bakke, F., Rokseth, R., & Håheim, L. L. (1997). Stroke Unit Treatment: Long-term Effects. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.10.1861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.