The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Organised stroke unit care is provided by multidisciplinary teams that exclusively manage stroke patients in a dedicated ward (stroke, acute, rehabilitation, comprehensive), with a mobile stroke team or within a generic disability service (mixed rehabilitation ward). OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of stroke unit care compared with alternative forms of care for patients following a stroke. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register (last searched April 2006), the reference lists of relevant articles, and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and prospective controlled clinical trials comparing organised inpatient stroke unit care with an alternative service. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors initially assessed eligibility and trial quality. Descriptive details and trial data were then checked with the co-ordinators of the original trials. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-one trials, involving 6936 participants, compared stroke unit care with an alternative service; more organised care was consistently associated with improved outcomes. Twenty-six trials (5592 participants) compared stroke unit care with general wards. Stroke unit care showed reductions in the odds of death recorded at final (median one year) follow up (odds ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 0.98; P = 0.02), the odds of death or institutionalised care (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92; P = 0.0006) and death or dependency (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92; P = 0.001). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the observed benefits remained when the analysis was restricted to trials that used formal randomisation procedures with blinded outcome assessment. Outcomes were independent of patient age, sex or stroke severity, but appeared to be better in stroke units based in a discrete ward. There was no indication that organised stroke unit care resulted in a longer hospital stay. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Stroke patients who receive organised inpatient care in a stroke unit are more likely to be alive, independent, and living at home one year after the stroke. The benefits were most apparent in units based in a discrete ward. No systematic increase was observed in the length of inpatient stay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Langhorne, P., Williams, B. O., Gilchrist, W., & Howie, K. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92813-9 · Cited by 588
Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial.
Indredavik, B., Bakke, F., Solberg, R., Rokseth, R., Haaheim, L. L., & Holme, I. (1991) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.22.8.1026 · Cited by 461
Treatment in a Combined Acute and Rehabilitation Stroke Unit: Which Aspects Are Most Important?
Indredavik, B., Bakke, F., Slørdahl, S. A., Rokseth, R., & Håheim, L. L. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.5.917 · Cited by 368
Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration (1997) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.28.11.2139 · Cited by 306
Stroke Unit Treatment: Long-term Effects
Indredavik, B., Slørdahl, S. A., Bakke, F., Rokseth, R., & Håheim, L. L. (1997) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.28.10.1861 · Cited by 284
Stroke Unit Treatment: 10-Year Follow-Up
Indredavik, B., Bakke, F., Slørdahl, S. A., Rokseth, R., & Håheim, L. L. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.8.1524 · Cited by 263
Strand, T., Asplund, K., Eriksson, S., Hägg, E., Lithner, F., & Wester, P. O. (1985) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.16.1.29 · Cited by 233
Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trial
Kalra, L., Evans, A., Perez, I., Knapp, M. R. J., Donaldson, N., & Swift, C. G. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02679-9 · Cited by 216
Improving stroke rehabilitation. A controlled study.
Kalra, L., Dale, P., & Crome, P. (1993) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.24.10.1462 · Cited by 213
Cited by
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Benjamin, E. J., Blaha, M. J., Chiuve, S. E., Cushman, M., Das, S. R., Deo, R., de Ferranti, S. D., Floyd, J., Fornage, M., Gillespie, C., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000485 · Cited by 12,591
Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the american heart association
Benjamin, E. J., Virani, S. S., Callaway, C. W., Chamberlain, A. M., Chang, A. R., Cheng, S., Chiuve, S. E., Cushman, M., Delling, F. N., Deo, R., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000558 · Cited by 7,146
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. J., Go, A. S., Arnett, D. K., Blaha, M. J., Cushman, M., Das, S. R., de Ferranti, S., Després, J.-P., Fullerton, H. J., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000350 · Cited by 6,596
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2015 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. J., Go, A. S., Arnett, D. K., Blaha, M. J., Cushman, M., de Ferranti, S., Després, J.-P., Fullerton, H. J., Howard, V. J., et al. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000152 · Cited by 5,797
Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R. L., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000098 · Cited by 3,293
Metadata
- Authors
- Collaboratio, S. U. T.
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Published
- 2007-10-17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- CD000197-CD000197
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2554177821
- Cited by
- 1,314
- References
- 43
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/14651858.cd000197.pub2
- The paper
- Collaboratio, S. U. T. (2007). Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000197.pub2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.