Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Antihypertensive Treatment in Patients Having Already Suffered From Stroke: Gathering the Evidence

Gueyffier, François, Boissel, Jean-Pierre, Boutitie, Florent, Pocock, Stuart, Coope, John, Cutler, Jeffrey, Ekbom, Tord, Fagard, Robert, Friedman, Lawrence, Kerlikowske, Karla, Perry, Mitchell, Prineas, Ronald, Schron, Eleanor·1997·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose Drug treatment of high blood pressure has been shown to reduce the associated cardiovascular risk. Stroke represents the type of event more strongly linked with high blood pressure, responsible for a high rate of death or invalidity, and with the highest proportion of events that can be avoided by treatment. Hypertensive patients with a history of cerebrovascular accident are at particularly high risk of recurrence. Specific trials of blood pressure lowering drugs in stroke survivors showed inconclusive results in the past. Methods We performed a meta-analysis using all available randomized controlled clinical trials assessing the effect of blood pressure lowering drugs on clinical outcomes (recurrence of stroke, coronary events, cause-specific, and overall mortality) in patients with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. Results We identified 9 trials, including a total of 6752 patients: 2 trials included 551 hypertensive stroke survivors; 6 trials of hypertensive patients included a small proportion of stroke survivors (536 patients); 1 trial included stroke survivors, whether hypertensive or not (5665 patients). The recurrence of stroke, fatal and nonfatal, was significantly reduced in active groups compared with control groups consistently across the different sources of data (relative risk of 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 0.85). There was no evidence that this intervention induced serious adverse effect. Conclusions Blood pressure lowering drug interventions reduced the risk of stroke recurrence in stroke survivors. Available data did not allow to verify whether such benefit depends on initial blood pressure level. More data are needed before considering antihypertensive therapy in normotensive patients at high cerebrovascular risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2557

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Gueyffier, F., Boissel, J.-P., Boutitie, F., Pocock, S., Coope, J., Cutler, J., Ekbom, T., Fagard, R., Friedman, L., Kerlikowske, K., Perry, M., Prineas, R., & Schron, E.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1997-12
Volume
28
Issue
12
Pages
2557-2562
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2011710844
Cited by
250
References
1
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Antihypertensive Treatment in Patients Having Already Suffered From Stroke: Gathering the Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.28.12.2557
The paper
Gueyffier, F., Boissel, J.-P., Boutitie, F., Pocock, S., Coope, J., Cutler, J., Ekbom, T., Fagard, R., Friedman, L., Kerlikowske, K., Perry, M., Prineas, R., & Schron, E. (1997). Effect of Antihypertensive Treatment in Patients Having Already Suffered From Stroke: Gathering the Evidence. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.12.2557

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.