Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stroke Patients’ Knowledge of Stroke: Influence on Time to Presentation

Williams, Linda S., Bruno, Askiel, Rouch, Dorinda, Marriott, Deanna J., MAS·1997·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose New treatments for acute stroke will likely have to be given soon after stroke onset. Little is known about stroke patients’ general knowledge about stroke, their interpretation of stroke symptoms, and how these factors influence the timing of their decision to seek medical attention. Methods We interviewed consecutive stroke patients within 72 hours of stroke onset to define factors influencing time of arrival to the emergency department. Data recorded included demographic information, method of transportation, type of stroke symptoms, the patient’s interpretation of the symptoms, previous stroke, and knowledge of stroke warning signs. Stroke severity was measured with the Barthel Index. Early arrival was defined as within 3 hours of awareness of symptoms. Results Sixty-seven patients were interviewed; 96% had an ischemic stroke and 4% a cerebral hemorrhage. Although 38% of patients professed to know the warning signs of stroke, only 25% correctly interpreted their symptoms. Patients with prior stroke were more likely to correctly interpret their symptoms (45% versus 16%; P =.03) but were not more likely to present early (19% versus 39%; P =.35). Eighty-six percent of patients presenting more than 3 hours after stroke onset thought that their symptoms were not serious. The 24% (n=16) of early arrivals were more likely to arrive by ambulance (81% versus 38%; P =.003) and had more severe strokes (Barthel Index score of 49 versus 72; P =.01) than late arrivals. Arrival by ambulance was independently associated with early arrival (odds ratio, 5.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.37 to 22.6). Conclusions Approximately one quarter of stroke patients correctly interpret their symptoms as representing a stroke. This knowledge is not associated with early presentation to the emergency department. Ambulance transport is independently associated with early arrival at the emergency department. Even when patients know that they are having a stroke, most present late because they perceive their symptoms as “not serious.” Widespread public education of stroke-prone individuals may increase the proportion of patients eligible for new acute stroke treatments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.28.5.912

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
Williams, L. S., Bruno, A., Rouch, D., Marriott, D. J., & MAS
Venue
Stroke
Published
1997-05
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
912-915
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2128297528
Cited by
324
References
1
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stroke Patients’ Knowledge of Stroke: Influence on Time to Presentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.28.5.912
The paper
Williams, L. S., Bruno, A., Rouch, D., Marriott, D. J., & MAS. (1997). Stroke Patients’ Knowledge of Stroke: Influence on Time to Presentation. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.5.912

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.