The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Six-Hour Window of Opportunity for Calpain Inhibition in Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose —Stroke patients often experience a significant temporal delay between the onset of ischemia and the time to initiation of therapy. Thus, there is a need for neuroprotectants with a long therapeutic window of opportunity. The efficacy of a potent, central nervous system–penetrating calpain inhibitor (MDL 28,170) was evaluated in a temporary model of focal cerebral ischemia to determine the window of opportunity for intracellular protease inhibition. Methods —An ex vivo brain protease inhibition assay established pharmacodynamic dosing parameters for MDL 28,170. Middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion was accomplished by advancing a monofilament through the internal carotid artery to the origin of the MCA. Postmortem infarct volumes were determined by quantitative image analysis of triphenyltetrazolium-stained brain sections. Results —Maximal inhibition of brain protease activity was observed 30 minutes after injection of MDL 28,170 with an estimated pharmacodynamic half-life of 2 hours. MDL 28,170 caused a dose-dependent reduction in infarct volume when administered 30 minutes after MCA occlusion. A window of opportunity study was conducted to determine the maximal delay between the onset of ischemia and the initiation of efficacious therapy. MDL 28,170 reduced infarct volume when therapy was delayed for 0.5, 3, 4, and 6 hours after the initiation of ischemia. The protective effect of MDL 28,170 was lost after an 8-hour delay. Conclusions —These data indicate that the therapeutic window of opportunity for calpain inhibition is at least 6 hours in a reversible focal cerebral ischemia model. This protection is observed despite the lethal hypoxic and excitotoxic challenge, suggesting that calpain activation may be an obligatory, downstream event in the ischemic cell death cascade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke
(1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512143332401 · Cited by 11,654
Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats.
Longa, E. Z., Weinstein, P. R., Carlson, S., & Cummins, R. (1989) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.20.1.84 · Cited by 7,463
Cited by
Ischemic Cell Death in Brain Neurons
Lipton, P. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1431 · Cited by 3,043
The changing landscape of ischaemic brain injury mechanisms
Lee, J.-M., Zipfel, G. J., & Choi, D. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/399a007 · Cited by 1,102
Calpain and caspase: can you tell the difference?
Wang, K. K. W. (2000) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01479-4 · Cited by 912
All roads lead to disconnection? – Traumatic axonal injury revisited
Büki, A., & Povlishock, J. T. (2006) · Acta Neurochirurgica · doi:10.1007/s00701-005-0674-4 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Markgraf, C. G., Velayo, N. L., Johnson, M. P., McCarty, D. R., Medhi, S., Koehl, J. R., Chmielewski, P. A., & Linnik, M. D.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 152-158
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1820347542
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Six-Hour Window of Opportunity for Calpain Inhibition in Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.29.1.152
- The paper
- Markgraf, C. G., Velayo, N. L., Johnson, M. P., McCarty, D. R., Medhi, S., Koehl, J. R., Chmielewski, P. A., & Linnik, M. D. (1998). Six-Hour Window of Opportunity for Calpain Inhibition in Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.1.152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.