The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A New Approach to Retrain Gait in Stroke Patients Through Body Weight Support and Treadmill Stimulation
Abstract
Background and Purpose —A new gait training strategy for patients with stroke proposes to support a percentage of the patient’s body weight while retraining gait on a treadmill. This research project intended to compare the effects of gait training with body weight support (BWS) and with no body weight support (no-BWS) on clinical outcome measures for patients with stroke. Methods —One hundred subjects with stroke were randomized to receive one of two treatments while walking on a treadmill: 50 subjects were trained to walk with up to 40% of their body weight supported by a BWS system with overhead harness (BWS group), and the other 50 subjects were trained to walk bearing full weight on their lower extremities (no-BWS group). Treatment outcomes were assessed on the basis of functional balance, motor recovery, overground walking speed, and overground walking endurance. Results —After a 6-week training period, the BWS group scored significantly higher than the no-BWS group for functional balance ( P =0.001), motor recovery ( P =0.001), overground walking speed ( P =0.029), and overground walking endurance ( P =0.018). The follow-up evaluation, 3 months after training, revealed that the BWS group continued to have significantly higher scores for overground walking speed ( P =0.006) and motor recovery ( P =0.039). Conclusions —Retraining gait in patients with stroke while a percentage of their body weight was supported resulted in better walking abilities than gait training while the patients were bearing their full weight. This novel gait training strategy provides a dynamic and integrative approach for the treatment of gait dysfunction after stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Billinger, S. A., Arena, R., Bernhardt, J., Eng, J. J., Franklin, B. A., Johnson, C. M., MacKay-Lyons, M., Macko, R. F., Mead, G. E., Roth, E. J., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000022 · Cited by 1,529
What Is the Evidence for Physical Therapy Poststroke? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E., van Peppen, R., van der Wees, P. J., Hendriks, E., Rietberg, M., & Kwakkel, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987 · Cited by 1,203
The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?
Van Peppen, R. P., Kwakkel, G., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hendriks, H. J., Van der Wees, P. J., & Dekker, J. (2004) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215504cr843oa · Cited by 942
Patient- cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results
Riener, R., Lunenburger, L., Jezernik, S., Anderschitz, M., Colombo, G., & Dietz, V. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.848628 · Cited by 729
Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke
Hidler, J., Nichols, D., Pelliccio, M., Brady, K., Campbell, D. D., Kahn, J. H., & Hornby, T. G. (2009) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968308326632 · Cited by 652
Metadata
- Authors
- Visintin, M., Barbeau, H., Korner-Bitensky, N., & Mayo, N. E.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1122-1128
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2118320918
- Cited by
- 688
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Approach to Retrain Gait in Stroke Patients Through Body Weight Support and Treadmill Stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.29.6.1122
- The paper
- Visintin, M., Barbeau, H., Korner-Bitensky, N., & Mayo, N. E. (1998). A New Approach to Retrain Gait in Stroke Patients Through Body Weight Support and Treadmill Stimulation. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.6.1122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.