Cited by 103Nerve injury and regenerationNeuroprotection in Cerebral IschemiaNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expression of Nerve Growth Factor and trkA After Transient Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats

Lee, Tsong-Hai, Kato, Hiroyuki, Chen, Sien-Tsong, Kogure, Kyuya, Itoyama, Yasuto·1998·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose—In vitro studies have shown that nerve growth factor (NGF) is protective to cortical neurons against various insults. However, the role of NGF in relation to its high-affinity trkA receptor in the cortical neurons has not been well discussed. In this experiment, we studied the possible involvement of the NGF/receptor system in the ischemic injury of cortical neurons after focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Methods—Male Wistar rats received right middle cerebral artery occlusion of 90 minutes’ duration. The rats were decapitated at different reperfusion time points: hour 4 and days 1, 3, 7, and 14 of recirculation. Brain sections at the level of striatum were immunostained against NGF, trkA, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and stress protein HSP70. Double immunostaining against NGF and GFAP was also performed. Optical density of NGF immunoreactivity in the ischemic and nonischemic cortexes was compared between sham-control and ischemic animals. Results—In the sham-control rats, NGF immunoreactivity was present in the cortical and striatal neurons. However, beginning at hour 4 after recirculation, there was a significant decrease of NGF in the ischemic cortex and striatum. Beginning at day 1, NGF was absent completely in the infarcted striatum and cortex. However, in the peri-infarct penumbra area, despite a decrease in NGF at hour 4 and day 1, NGF recovered beginning at day 3 and returned almost to the sham-control level at day 14. In the nonischemic cortex, NGF increased beginning at hour 4, peaked at day 7, and returned almost to the sham-control level at day 14. The trkA and HSP70 immunoreactivities were not present in the sham-control cortex. However, trkA was induced at hour 4 in the ischemic cortex and at days 1 and 3 in the peri-infarct penumbra cortex. The HSP70 was induced at days 1 and 3 in the peri-infarct penumbra area. Double immunostaining showed that the number of GFAP-positive cells increased gradually, and NGF immunoreactivity in the GFAP-positive cells became gradually intense after ischemia. Conclusions—Our study demonstrated a temporal profile of NGF and trkA in the ischemic cortex and NGF expression by reactive astrocytes. Our data suggest that the NGF/receptor system may play a role in the astrocyte/neuron interaction under certain pathological conditions, such as focal cerebral ischemia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.29.8.1687

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90040-8 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5454 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03791.x · DOI
  4. 10.1038/341149a0 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.3306916 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.2321006 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90307-D · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0165-3806(89)90078-3 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.88.3.961 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.89.2.648 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90451-K · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90347-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.51 · DOI
  14. 10.1161/01.STR.21.12.1734 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90885-B · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0304-3940(89)90425-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90204-6 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0304-3940(92)90853-Y · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb08888.x · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0169-328X(89)90033-8 · DOI
  21. 10.1161/str.20.8.2756535 · DOI
  22. 10.1161/str.20.1.2643202 · DOI
  23. 10.3171/jns.1992.77.2.0169 · DOI
  24. 10.1161/str.25.7.8023359 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0306-4522(97)00346-1 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01510-8 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.91.19.9077 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/cne.903500407 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.13 · DOI
  30. 10.1161/str.23.9.1519285 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/cne.903190310 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/cne.903410407 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.83.3.817 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0165-0173(87)90008-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/science.2897715 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/jnr.490200402 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91766-L · DOI
  38. 10.1161/str.25.8.7518971 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1992.tb00790.x · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91369-4 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91857-0 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/jcbfm.1994.86 · DOI
  43. 10.1097/00001756-199210000-00016 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00793.x · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90184-F · DOI
  46. Saporito MS, Brown ER, Hartpence KC, Wilcox HM, Robbins E, Vaught JL, Carswell S. Systemic dexamethasone administration increases septal Trk autophosphorylation in adult rats via an induction of nerve growth factor. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;45:395–401. · DOI
  47. 10.1006/exnr.1994.1217 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90285-2 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6439 · DOI
  50. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-09-04029.1993 · DOI
  51. 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.62 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0006-291X(86)90876-4 · DOI
  53. Altar CA, Armanini M, Dugich-Djordjevic M, Bennett GL, Williams R, Feinglass S, Anicetti V, Sinicropi D, Bakhit C. Recovery of cholinergic phenotype in the injured rat neostriatum: role for endogenous and exogenous nerve growth factor. J Neurochem. 1992;59:2167–2177. · DOI
  54. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91217-O · DOI
  55. 10.1002/glia.440070116 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/282080a0 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)41950-3 · DOI
  58. 10.1126/science.7701324 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb26693.x · DOI
  60. 10.1161/circ.97.7.645 · DOI
  61. 10.1161/circ.97.12.1114 · DOI
  62. 10.1056/NEJM199804233381702 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90209-7 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/S0014-2999(96)00593-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, T.-H., Kato, H., Chen, S.-T., Kogure, K., & Itoyama, Y.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Venue
Stroke
Published
1998-08
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1687-1697
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2150083975
Cited by
103
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroprotection in Cerebral Ischemia
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
nerve growth factor, TrkA, focal cerebral ischemia, middle cerebral artery occlusion, cortical neurons, striatum, HSP70, glial fibrillary acidic protein, reactive astrocytes, neuroprotection, ischemia-reperfusion injury, neurodegeneration, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Astrocytes, Cerebral Cortex, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Corpus Striatum, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Male, Nerve Growth Factors, Neurons, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, Nerve Growth Factor, HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Receptor, trkA, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review