Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What Determines Good Recovery in Patients With the Most Severe Strokes?: The Copenhagen Stroke Study

Open access
Jørgensen, Henrik S., Reith, Jakob, Nakayama, Hirofumi, Kammersgaard, Lars P., Raaschou, Hans O., Olsen, Tom Skyhøj·1999·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Even patients with the most severe strokes sometimes experience a remarkably good recovery. We evaluated possible predictors of a good outcome to search for new therapeutic strategies. Methods —We included the 223 patients (19%) with the most severe strokes (Scandinavian Stroke Scale score <15 points) from the 1197 unselected patients in the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Of these, 139 (62%) died in the hospital and were excluded. The 26 survivors (31%) with a good functional outcome (Barthel Index ≥50 points) were compared with the 58 survivors (69%) with a poor functional outcome (Barthel Index <50 points). The predictive value of the following factors was examined in a multivariate logistic regression model: age; sex; a spouse; work; home care before stroke; initial stroke severity; blood pressure, blood glucose, and body temperature on admission; stroke subtype; neurological impairment 1 week after onset; diabetes; hypertension; atrial fibrillation; ischemic heart disease; previous stroke; and other disabling disease. Results —Decreasing age (odds ratio [OR], 0.50 per 10-year decrease; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.99; P =0.04), a spouse (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 8.8; P =0.03), decreasing body temperature on admission (OR, 1.8 per 1°C decrease; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.1; P =0.01), and neurological recovery after 1 week (OR, 3.2 per 10-point increase in Scandinavian Stroke Scale score; 95% CI, 1.1 to 7.8; P =0.01) were all independent predictors of good functional outcome. Conclusions —Patients with the most severe strokes who achieve a good functional outcome are generally characterized by younger age, the presence of a spouse at home, and early neurological recovery. Body temperature was a strong predictor of good functional outcome and the only potentially modifiable factor. We suggest that a randomized controlled trial be undertaken to evaluate whether active reduction of body temperature can improve the generally poor prognosis of patients with the most severe strokes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Jørgensen, H. S., Reith, J., Nakayama, H., Kammersgaard, L. P., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1999-10
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
2008-2012
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2065546970
Cited by
174
References
0
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Determines Good Recovery in Patients With the Most Severe Strokes?: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.30.10.2008
The paper
Jørgensen, H. S., Reith, J., Nakayama, H., Kammersgaard, L. P., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1999). What Determines Good Recovery in Patients With the Most Severe Strokes?: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.10.2008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.