Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of White Matter Damage in Ischemic Leukoaraiosis with Diffusion Tensor MRI

Open access
Jones, Derek K., Lythgoe, David, Horsfield, Mark A., Simmons, Andrew, Williams, Steve C. R., Markus, Hugh S.·1999·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Information on the neuropathological changes underlying ischemic leukoaraiosis is only available postmortem, and there are limited data on histological appearances early in the disease. Diffusion tensor imaging allows determination of the directionality of diffusion, which is greater in the direction of white matter bundles. Therefore, the technique might be expected to show loss of anisotropy (directional diffusion) in leukoaraiosis. Methods —Nine patients with ischemic leukoaraiosis (radiological leukoaraiosis and clinical lacunar stroke) and 10 age-matched controls were studied. Diffusion tensor imaging was performed, and maps of diffusion trace and fractional anisotropy were constructed. Mean values of trace and fractional anisotropy were determined in standard regions of the anterior and posterior white matter in both hemispheres. Results —In all patients with ischemic leukoaraiosis, a characteristic abnormal pattern was found, with loss of anisotropy and increased trace in the white matter. For example, in the right anterior white matter mean (SD) trace/3 was 1.12 (0.33) ×10 −3 mm 2 s −1 in patients and 0.75 (0.11) in controls ( P =0.001). In the same region, fractional anisotropy was 0.53 (0.11) in patients and 0.78 (0.09) in controls ( P <0.001). Within the white matter regions, there was a strong negative correlation between mean diffusivity and anisotropy ( r =−0.92, P <0.0001). Conclusions —The characteristic pattern found on diffusion tensor imaging in this patient group is consistent with axonal loss and gliosis leading to impairment to and loss of directional diffusion. The “in vivo histological” information obtained may be useful in monitoring disease progression and in investigating the pathogenesis of the cognitive impairment that may be present.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.30.2.393

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Jones, D. K., Lythgoe, D., Horsfield, M. A., Simmons, A., Williams, S. C. R., & Markus, H. S.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1999-02
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
393-397
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2168523142
Cited by
310
References
3
FWCI
14.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of White Matter Damage in Ischemic Leukoaraiosis with Diffusion Tensor MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.30.2.393
The paper
Jones, D. K., Lythgoe, D., Horsfield, M. A., Simmons, A., Williams, S. C. R., & Markus, H. S. (1999). Characterization of White Matter Damage in Ischemic Leukoaraiosis with Diffusion Tensor MRI. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.2.393

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.