The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Progression of Mass Effect After Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose —While the evolution of mass effect after cerebral infarction is well characterized, similar data regarding intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are scant. Our goal was to determine the time course and cause for progression of mass effect after ICH. Methods —Patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH who underwent ≥2 CT scans were identified in our prospectively collected database. CT lesion size and midline shift of the pineal and septum pellucidum were retrospectively measured and correlated with clinical and CT characteristics. Causes for increased midline shift were determined by 2 independent observers. Results —Seventy-six patients underwent 235 scans (3.1±1.3 per patient). Initial CT was obtained within 24 hours of ICH in 66. Twenty-five scans were repeated on day 1, 80 on days 2 through 7, 31 on days 8 through 14, and 24 >14 days after ICH. Midline shift was present on 88% of the initial scans. There were 17 instances of midline shift progression: 10 occurred early (0.2 to 1.7 days) and were associated with hematoma enlargement, and 7 occurred late (9 to 21 days) and were associated with edema progression. Progression of mass effect due to edema occurred with larger hemorrhages ( P <0.05). Of 65 scans repeated for clinical deterioration, only 10 were associated with increased mass effect. Conclusions —Progression of mass effect after ICH occurred at 2 distinct time points: within 2 days, associated with hematoma enlargement, and in the second and third weeks, associated with increase in edema. The clinical significance of later-developing edema is unclear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
Qureshi, A. I., Tuhrim, S., Broderick, J. P., Batjer, H. H., Hondo, H., & Hanley, D. F. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105103441907 · Cited by 1,719
Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage: A factor in progressive midline shift and outcome
Vespa, P. M., O’Phelan, K., Shah, M., Mirabelli, J., Starkman, S., Kidwell, C., Saver, J., Nuwer, M. R., Frazee, J. G., McArthur, D. A., et al. (2003) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000063316.47591.b4 · Cited by 561
Complications of intracerebral haemorrhage
Balami, J. S., & Buchan, A. M. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70264-2 · Cited by 444
(2006) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000094831 · Cited by 411
Density and Shape as CT Predictors of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Growth
Barras, C. D., Tress, B. M., Christensen, S., MacGregor, L., Collins, M., Desmond, P. M., Skolnick, B. E., Mayer, S. A., Broderick, J. P., Diringer, M. N., et al. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.536888 · Cited by 313
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zazulia, A. R., Diringer, M. N., Derdeyn, C. P., & Powers, W. J.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1167-1173
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1967290285
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progression of Mass Effect After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.30.6.1167
- The paper
- Zazulia, A. R., Diringer, M. N., Derdeyn, C. P., & Powers, W. J. (1999). Progression of Mass Effect After Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.6.1167
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.