Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electrical Stimulation of Wrist Extensors in Poststroke Hemiplegia

Open access
Powell, Joanna, Pandyan, A. David, Granat, Malcolm, Cameron, Margaret, Stott, David J.·1999·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —It has been suggested that cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (ES) may enhance motor recovery after stroke. We have investigated the effects of ES of the wrist extensors on impairment of wrist function and on upper-limb disability in patients being rehabilitated after acute stroke. Methods —We recruited 60 hemiparetic patients (mean age, 68 years) 2 to 4 weeks after stroke into a randomized, controlled, parallel-group study comparing standard rehabilitation treatment with standard treatment plus ES of wrist extensors (3 times 30 minutes daily for 8 weeks). Isometric strength of wrist extensors was measured using a device built for that purpose. Upper-limb disability was assessed with use of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Observations were continued for 32 weeks (24 weeks after the finish of ES or the control intervention phase). Results —The change in isometric strength of wrist extensors (at an angle of 0° extension) was significantly greater in the ES group than the control group at both 8 and 32 weeks ( P =0.004, P =0.014 by Mann Whitney U test). At week 8 the grasp and grip subscores of the ARAT increased significantly in the ES group compared with that in the control group ( P =0.013 and P =0.02, respectively); a similar trend was seen for the total ARAT score ( P =0.11). In the subgroup of 33 patients with some residual wrist extensor strength at study entry (moment at 0° extension >0), the ARAT total score had increased at week 8 by a mean of 21.1 (SD, 12.7) in the ES group compared with 10.3 (SD, 9.0) in the control group ( P =0.024, Mann Whitney U test); however, at 32 weeks the differences between these 2 subgroups were no longer statistically significant. Conclusions —ES of the wrist extensors enhances the recovery of isometric wrist extensor strength in hemiparetic stroke patients. Upper-limb disability was reduced after 8 weeks of ES therapy, with benefits most apparent in those with some residual motor function at the wrist. However, it is not clear how long the improvements in upper-limb disability are maintained after ES is discontinued.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.30.7.1384

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Powell, J., Pandyan, A. D., Granat, M., Cameron, M., & Stott, D. J.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1999-07
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
1384-1389
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2164987441
Cited by
321
References
0
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical Stimulation of Wrist Extensors in Poststroke Hemiplegia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.30.7.1384
The paper
Powell, J., Pandyan, A. D., Granat, M., Cameron, M., & Stott, D. J. (1999). Electrical Stimulation of Wrist Extensors in Poststroke Hemiplegia. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.7.1384

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.