Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Benefit of an Extended Stroke Unit Service With Early Supported Discharge: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Indredavik, Bent, Fjærtoft, Hild, Ekeberg, Gun, Løge, Anne D., Mørch, Birgitte·2000·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Several trials have shown that stroke unit care improves outcome for stroke patients. The aim of the present trial was to evaluate the effects of an extended stroke unit service (ESUS), with early supported discharge, cooperation with the primary healthcare system, and more emphasis on rehabilitation at home as essential elements. Methods —In a randomized, controlled trial, 160 patients with acute stroke were allocated to the ESUS and 160 to the ordinary stroke unit service (OSUS). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were independent as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (RS) (RS ≤2=global independence) and independent in activities of daily living (ADL) as assessed by Barthel Index (BI) (BI ≥95=independent in ADL) after 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were RS and BI scores after 6 weeks; the proportion of patients at home, in institutions, and deceased after 6 and 26 weeks; and the length of stay in institutions. Results —After 26 weeks, 65.0% in the ESUS versus 51.9% in the OSUS group showed global independence (RS ≤2) ( P= 0.017) , while 60.0% in the ESUS versus 49.4% in the OSUS group were independent in ADL (BI ≥95) ( P =0.056). The odds ratios for independence (ESUS versus OSUS) were as follows: RS, 1.72 (95% CI, 1.10 to 2.70); BI, 1.54 (95% CI, 0.99 to 2.39). At 6 weeks, 54.4% of the ESUS group and 45.6% of the OSUS group were independent according to RS ( P =0.118), and 56.3% versus 48.8% were independent according to BI ( P =0.179). The proportion of patients at home after 6 weeks was 74.4% for ESUS and 55.6% for OSUS ( P =0.0004), and the proportion in institutions was 23.1% versus 40.0%, respectively ( P =0.001). After 26 weeks, 78.8% in the ESUS group versus 73.1% in the OSUS were at home ( P =0.239), while 13.1% versus 17.5% were in institutions ( P =0.277). The mortality in the 2 groups did not differ. Average lengths of stay in an institution were 18.6 days in the ESUS and 31.1 days in the OSUS group ( P =0.0324). Conclusions —An ESUS with early supported discharge seems to improve functional outcome and to reduce the length of stay in institutions compared with traditional stroke unit care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.31.12.2989

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Indredavik, B., Fjærtoft, H., Ekeberg, G., Løge, A. D., & Mørch, B.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2000-12
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
2989-2994
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2129772061
Cited by
163
References
1
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefit of an Extended Stroke Unit Service With Early Supported Discharge: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.31.12.2989
The paper
Indredavik, B., Fjærtoft, H., Ekeberg, G., Løge, A. D., & Mørch, B. (2000). Benefit of an Extended Stroke Unit Service With Early Supported Discharge: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.31.12.2989

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.