The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence of the Major Stroke Subtypes: Initial Findings From the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS)
Abstract
Background and Purpose — Population-based stroke incidence studies are the only accurate way to determine the number of strokes that occur in a given society. Because the major stroke subtypes have different patterns of incidence and outcome, information on the natural history of stroke subtypes is essential. The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence and case-fatality rate of the major stroke subtypes in a geographically defined region of Melbourne, Australia. Methods — All suspected strokes that occurred among 133 816 residents of suburbs north and east of Melbourne, Australia, during a 12-month period of 1996 and 1997 were identified and assessed. Multiple overlapping sources were used to ascertain cases, and standard criteria for stroke and case-fatality were used. Stroke subtypes were defined by CT, MRI, and autopsy. Results — Three hundred eighty-one strokes occurred among 353 persons during the study period, with 276 (72%) being first-ever-in-a-lifetime strokes. Of these, 72.5% (95% CI 67.2% to 77.7%) were cerebral infarction, 14.5% (95% CI 10.3% to 18.6%) were intracerebral hemorrhage, 4.3% (95% CI 1.9% to 6.8%) were subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 8.7% (95% CI 5.4% to 12.0%) were stroke of undetermined type. The 28-day case-fatality rate was 12% (95% CI 7% to 16%) for cerebral infarction, 45% (95% CI 30% to 60%) for intracerebral hemorrhage, 50% (95% CI 22% to 78%) for subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 38% (95% CI 18% to 57%) for stroke of undetermined type. Conclusions — The overall distribution of stroke subtypes and 28-day case-fatality rates are not significantly different from those of most European countries or the United States. There may, however, be some differences in the incidence of subtypes within Australia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke
(1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199512143332401 · Cited by 11,654
Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
(1970) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85851-2 · Cited by 8,501
Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction
Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Dennis, M., Warlow, C., & Burn, J. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-o · Cited by 3,294
Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report.
Hatano, S. (1976) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,526
Sudlow, C. L. M., & Warlow, C. P. (1997) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.28.3.491 · Cited by 885
Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Dennis, M., Burn, J., & Warlow, C. (1990) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.53.1.16 · Cited by 814
Schievink, W. I. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199701023360106 · Cited by 690
Stroke incidence, prevalence, and survival: secular trends in Rochester, Minnesota, through 1989.
Brown, R. D., Whisnant, J. P., Sicks, J. D., O’Fallon, W. M., & Wiebers, D. O. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 639
Bamford, J., Sandercock, P., Dennis, M., Warlow, C., Jones, L., McPherson, K., Vessey, M., Fowler, G., Molyneux, A., & Hughes, T. (1988) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.51.11.1373 · Cited by 470
Comparing Stroke Incidence Worldwide: What Makes Studies Comparable?
Sudlow, C. L. M., & Warlow, C. P. (1996) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.27.3.550 · Cited by 451
Cited by
Feigin, V. L., Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., Barker-Collo, S. L., & Parag, V. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70025-0 · Cited by 2,855
van Asch, C. J., Luitse, M. J., Rinkel, G. J., van der Tweel, I., Algra, A., & Klijn, C. J. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70340-0 · Cited by 2,658
Feigin, V. L., Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., & Anderson, C. S. (2003) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00266-7 · Cited by 1,932
Nieuwkamp, D. J., Setz, L. E., Algra, A., Linn, F. H., de Rooij, N. K., & Rinkel, G. J. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70126-7 · Cited by 1,507
How common are the "common" neurologic disorders?
Hirtz, D., Thurman, D. J., Gwinn-Hardy, K., Mohamed, M., Chaudhuri, A. R., & Zalutsky, R. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000252807.38124.a3 · Cited by 1,365
Metadata
- Authors
- Thrift, A. G., Dewey, H. M., Macdonell, R. A. L., McNeil, J. J., & Donnan, G. A.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1732-1738
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2168350521
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of the Major Stroke Subtypes: Initial Findings From the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.32.8.1732
- The paper
- Thrift, A. G., Dewey, H. M., Macdonell, R. A. L., McNeil, J. J., & Donnan, G. A. (2001). Incidence of the Major Stroke Subtypes: Initial Findings From the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.8.1732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.