The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlled trial of aspirin in cerebral ischemia.
Open accessAbstract
Adouble-blind trial of aspirin for the treatment of cerebral ischemia was begun in 1972 and continued for 37 months. This was accomplished despite difficulties in controlling a long-term study of a drug which has widespread availability and consumption. The study design, criteria for selection of patients, follow-up surveillance, and methods of data analysis are presented. We report only subjects without carotid surgery before randomization. Patients (178) who had carotid transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) were randomly allocated to aspirin or placebo and followed to determine the incidence of subsequent TIAs,death, cerebral infarction or retinal infarction. Analysis of the first six months of follow-up revealed a statistically significant differential in favar of aspirin when death or cerebral or retinal infarction and the occurrence of TIAs were grouped and considered together as end points. Significance in favor of aspirin treatment was mainly revealed in patients with a history of multiple TIAs and was most evident in those individuals having carotid lesions appropriate to the TIA symptoms. It cannot be inferred from this study that aspirin prevents stroke because when end points were restriced to death or cerebral or retinal infarction, there was no statistically significant differential between the aspirin and placebo treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival
Cutler, S. J., & Ederer, F. (1958) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7 · Cited by 2,870
Cited by
Fibrinogen as a Risk Factor for Stroke and Myocardial Infarction
Wilhelmsen, L., Svärdsudd, K., Korsan-Bengtsen, K., Larsson, B., Welin, L., & Tibblin, G. (1984) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198408233110804 · Cited by 1,646
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases
Mazzolai, L., Teixido-Tura, G., Lanzi, S., Boc, V., Bossone, E., Brodmann, M., Bura-Rivière, A., De Backer, J., Deglise, S., Della Corte, A., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 · Cited by 993
Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Mayberg, M. R. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470230047029 · Cited by 964
Patrono, C., Coller, B., Dalen, J. E., Fitz Gerald, G. A., Fuster, V., Gent, M., Hirsh, J., & Roth, G. (2001) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.39s · Cited by 963
Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation
Rothwell, P. M. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17709-5 · Cited by 942
Metadata
- Authors
- Fields, W. S., Lemak, N. A., Frankowski, R. F., & Hardy, R. J.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1977-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-314
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2025695350
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlled trial of aspirin in cerebral ischemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.8.3.301
- The paper
- Fields, W. S., Lemak, N. A., Frankowski, R. F., & Hardy, R. J. (1977). Controlled trial of aspirin in cerebral ischemia. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.8.3.301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.