Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Endothelial Adhesion Molecules in Mouse Atherosclerosis Using Dual-Targeted Microparticles of Iron Oxide

Open access
McAteer, Martina A., Schneider, Jurgen E., Ali, Ziad A., Warrick, Nicholas, Bursill, Christina A., von zur Muhlen, Constantin, Greaves, David R., Neubauer, Stefan, Channon, Keith M., Choudhury, Robin P.·2008·Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

Abstract

Objective— Microparticles of iron oxide (MPIO) distort magnetic field creating marked contrast effects far exceeding their physical size. We hypothesized that antibody-conjugated MPIO would enable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of endothelial cell adhesion molecules in mouse atherosclerosis. Methods and Results— MPIO (4.5 μm) were conjugated to monoclonal antibodies against vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM–MPIO) or P-selectin (P-selectin–MPIO). In vitro, VCAM–MPIO bound, in dose-dependent manner, to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α stimulated sEND-1 endothelial cells, as quantified by light microscopy ( R 2 =0.94, P =0.03) and by MRI ( R 2 =0.98, P =0.01). VCAM–MPIO binding was blocked by preincubation with soluble VCAM-1. To mimic leukocyte binding, MPIO targeting both VCAM-1 and P-selectin were administered in apolipoprotein E −/− mice. By light microscopy, dual-targeted MPIO binding to endothelium overlying aortic root atherosclerosis was 5- to 7-fold more than P-selectin–MPIO ( P <0.05) or VCAM–MPIO ( P <0.01) alone. Dual-targeted MPIO, injected intravenously in vivo bound aortic root endothelium and were quantifiable by MRI ex vivo (3.5-fold increase versus control; P <0.01). MPIO were well-tolerated in vivo, with sequestration in the spleen after 24 hours. Conclusions— Dual-ligand MPIO bound to endothelium over atherosclerosis in vivo, under flow conditions. MPIO may provide a functional MRI probe for detecting endothelial-specific markers in a range of vascular pathologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/atvbaha.107.145466

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
McAteer, M. A., Schneider, J. E., Ali, Z. A., Warrick, N., Bursill, C. A., von zur Muhlen, C., Greaves, D. R., Neubauer, S., Channon, K. M., & Choudhury, R. P.
Venue
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Published
2008-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
77-83
ISSN
  • 1079-5642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4636
OpenAlex
W2147796717
Cited by
260
References
1
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Endothelial Adhesion Molecules in Mouse Atherosclerosis Using Dual-Targeted Microparticles of Iron Oxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/atvbaha.107.145466
The paper
McAteer, M. A., Schneider, J. E., Ali, Z. A., Warrick, N., Bursill, C. A., von zur Muhlen, C., Greaves, D. R., Neubauer, S., Channon, K. M., & Choudhury, R. P. (2008). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Endothelial Adhesion Molecules in Mouse Atherosclerosis Using Dual-Targeted Microparticles of Iron Oxide. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1161/atvbaha.107.145466

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.