The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Part 8: Post–Cardiac Arrest Care: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care
Open accessAbstract
Introduction The recommendations in this 2015 American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care are based on an extensive evidence review process that was begun by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) after the publication of the 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations and was completed in February 2015. In this in-depth evidence review process, ILCOR examined topics and then generated a prioritized list of questions for systematic review. Questions were first formulated in PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) format, and then search strategies and inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined and a search for relevant articles was performed. The evidence was evaluated by the ILCOR task forces by using the standardized methodological approach proposed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. The quality of the evidence was categorized based on the study methodologies and the 5 core GRADE domains of risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and other considerations (including publication bias). Then, where possible, consensus-based treatment recommendations were created. To create this 2015 Guidelines Update, the AHA formed 15 writing groups, with careful attention to manage conflicts of interest, to assess the ILCOR treatment recommendations and to write AHA treatment recommendations by using the AHA Class of Recommendation (COR) and Level of Evidence (LOE) system. The recommendations made in the Guidelines are informed by the ILCOR recommendations and GRADE classification, in the context of the delivery of medical care in North America. The AHA writing group made new recommendations only on topics specifically reviewed by ILCOR in 2015. This chapter delineates instances where the AHA writing group developed recommendations that are significantly stronger or weaker than the ILCOR statements. In the online version of this publication, live links are provided so the reader can connect directly to the systematic reviews on the Scientific Evidence Evaluation and Review System (SEERS) website. These links are indicated by a combination of letters and numbers (eg, ALS 790). We encourage readers to use the links and review the evidence and appendixes, including the GRADE tables. This update uses the newest AHA COR and LOE classification system, which contains modifications of the Class III recommendation and introduces LOE B-R (randomized studies) and B-NR (nonrandomized studies) as well as LOE C-LD (limited data) and LOE C-EO (consensus of expert opinion). All recommendations made in this 2015 Guidelines Update, as well as in the 2010 Guidelines for post‒cardiac arrest care, are listed in the Appendix. For further information, see “Part 2: Evidence Evaluation and Management of Conflicts of Interest” in this 2015 Guidelines Update.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
(2019) · doi:10.1002/9781119536604 · Cited by 14,828
Toward Understanding Tight Glycemic Control in the ICU
Marik, P. E., & Preiser, J.-C. (2010) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.09-1737 · Cited by 365
Benefits and Risks of Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults: A Meta-analysis
Wiener, R. S., Wiener, D. C., & Larson, R. J. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.8.933 · Cited by 200
Wu, O., Sorensen, A. G., Benner, T., Singhal, A. B., Furie, K. L., & Greer, D. M. (2009) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2521081232 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Stout, K. K., Daniels, C. J., Aboulhosn, J. A., Bozkurt, B., Broberg, C. S., Colman, J. M., Crumb, S. R., Dearani, J. A., Fuller, S., Gurvitz, M., et al. (2019) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000603 · Cited by 1,602
Kiguchi, T., Okubo, M., Nishiyama, C., Maconochie, I., Ong, M. E. H., Kern, K. B., Wyckoff, M. H., McNally, B., Christensen, E. F., Tjelmeland, I., et al. (2020) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.02.044 · Cited by 557
Self-citationSudden cardiac arrest survivorship: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association
Sawyer, K. N., Camp-Rogers, T. R., Kotini-Shah, P., Del Rios, M., Gossip, M. R., Moitra, V. K., Haywood, K. L., Dougherty, C. M., Lubitz, S. A., Rabinstein, A. A., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000747 · Cited by 311
Self-citationHypoxia after stroke: a review of experimental and clinical evidence
Ferdinand, P., & Roffe, C. (2016) · Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13231-016-0023-0 · Cited by 119
Caro-Codón, J., Rey, J. R., Lopez-de-Sa, E., González Fernández, Ó., Rosillo, S. O., Armada, E., Iniesta, Á. M., Fernández de Bobadilla, J., Ruiz Cantador, J., Rodríguez Sotelo, L., et al. (2018) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.015 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Callaway, C. W., Donnino, M. W., Fink, E. L., Geocadin, R. G., Golan, E., Kern, K. B., Leary, M., Meurer, W. J., Peberdy, M. A., Thompson, T. M., & Zimmerman, J. L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2015-11-03
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 18_suppl_2
- Pages
- S465-82
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2180469576
- Cited by
- 1,241
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 134.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.