Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Outcome After Successful Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Tzou, Wendy S., Marchlinski, Francis E., Zado, Erica S., Lin, David, Dixit, Sanjay, Callans, David J., Cooper, Joshua M., Bala, Rupa, Garcia, Fermin, Hutchinson, Mathew D., Riley, Michael P., Verdino, Ralph, Gerstenfeld, Edward P.·2010·Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background—: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly used for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), but few reports exist regarding long-term success. We determined 5-year outcomes of PVI among patients with freedom from AF off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) for 1 year after PVI. Methods and Results—: Consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF who underwent PVI at the University of Pennsylvania from 2000 to 2003 and were free from AF 1 year after ablation were included. Proximal isolation of PVs and non-PV triggers of AF was performed. Long-term ablation success, defined as freedom from AF off AAD after a single ablation procedure, was determined. All patients had transtelephonic monitoring at 3 to 6 months and 12 months and at least yearly contact thereafter. One hundred twenty-three patients were free of AF without AAD at 1 year. AF freedom off AAD was 85% at 3 years and 71% at 5 years, with an approximate 7% per year late recurrence rate after the first year. Patients with recurrent AF ≥5 years after index PVI were older, had larger left atrial size, more AF triggers and more likely had persistent AF. In multivariate analysis, persistent AF (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 5.7, P =0.005) and age (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.1, P =0.036) independently predicted long-term AF recurrence. Conclusions—: Among patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and AF freedom 1 year after segmental PVI, the majority (71%) remained free of AF for up to 5 years, with an approximate late recurrence rate of 7% per year. Continued vigilance for recurrent AF after PV isolation is warranted, particularly in patients with persistent AF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circep.109.923771

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Tzou, W. S., Marchlinski, F. E., Zado, E. S., Lin, D., Dixit, S., Callans, D. J., Cooper, J. M., Bala, R., Garcia, F., Hutchinson, M. D., Riley, M. P., Verdino, R., & Gerstenfeld, E. P.
Venue
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2010-06
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
237-242
ISSN
  • 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3149
OpenAlex
W2553690167
Cited by
237
References
1
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Outcome After Successful Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circep.109.923771
The paper
Tzou, W. S., Marchlinski, F. E., Zado, E. S., Lin, D., Dixit, S., Callans, D. J., Cooper, J. M., Bala, R., Garcia, F., Hutchinson, M. D., Riley, M. P., Verdino, R., & Gerstenfeld, E. P. (2010). Long-Term Outcome After Successful Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.109.923771

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.