Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcome Is Predicted by Left Atrial Remodeling on MRI

Open access
McGann, Christopher, Akoum, Nazem, Patel, Amit, Kholmovski, Eugene, Revelo, Patricia, Damal, Kavitha, Wilson, Brent, Cates, Josh, Harrison, Alexis, Ranjan, Ravi, Burgon, Nathan S., Greene, Tom, Kim, Dan, DiBella, Edward V.R., Parker, Dennis, MacLeod, Rob S., Marrouche, Nassir F.·2014·Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background—: Although catheter ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) is becoming more common, results vary widely, and patient selection criteria remain poorly defined. We hypothesized that late gadolinium enhancement MRI (LGE-MRI) can identify left atrial (LA) wall structural remodeling (SRM) and stratify patients who are likely or not to benefit from ablation therapy. Methods and Results—: LGE-MRI was performed on 426 consecutive patients with AF without contraindications to MRI before undergoing their first ablation procedure and on 21 non-AF control subjects. Patients were categorized by SRM stage (I–IV) based on the percentage of LA wall enhancement for correlation with procedure outcomes. Histological validation of SRM was performed comparing LGE-MRI with surgical biopsy. A total of 386 patients (91%) with adequate LGE-MRI scans were included in the study. After ablation, 123 patients (31.9%) experienced recurrent atrial arrhythmias during the 1-year follow-up. Recurrent arrhythmias (failed ablations) occurred at higher SRM stages with 28 of 133 (21.0%) in stage I, 40 of 140 (29.3%) in stage II, 24 of 71 (33.8%) in stage III, and 30 of 42 (71.4%) in stage IV. In multivariate analysis, ablation outcome was best predicted by advanced SRM stage (hazard ratio, 4.89; P <0.0001) and diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio, 1.64; P =0.036), whereas increased LA volume and persistent AF were not significant predictors. LA wall enhancement was significantly greater in patients with AF versus non-AF controls (16.6±11.2% versus 3.1±1.9%; P <0.0001). Histological evidence of remodeling from surgical biopsy specimens correlated with SRM on LGE-MRI. Conclusions—: Atrial SRM is identified on LGE-MRI, and extensive LGE (≥30% LA wall enhancement) predicts poor response to catheter ablation therapy for AF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circep.113.000689

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
McGann, C., Akoum, N., Patel, A., Kholmovski, E., Revelo, P., Damal, K., Wilson, B., Cates, J., Harrison, A., Ranjan, R., Burgon, N. S., Greene, T., Kim, D., DiBella, E. V. R., Parker, D., MacLeod, R. S., & Marrouche, N. F.
Venue
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2014-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
23-30
ISSN
  • 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3149
OpenAlex
W2165762489
Cited by
417
References
49
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcome Is Predicted by Left Atrial Remodeling on MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circep.113.000689
The paper
McGann, C., Akoum, N., Patel, A., Kholmovski, E., Revelo, P., Damal, K., Wilson, B., Cates, J., Harrison, A., Ranjan, R., Burgon, N. S., Greene, T., Kim, D., DiBella, E. V. R., Parker, D., MacLeod, R. S., & Marrouche, N. F. (2014). Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcome Is Predicted by Left Atrial Remodeling on MRI. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.113.000689

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.