Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complications of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review

Open access
Gupta, Aakriti, Perera, Tharani, Ganesan, Anand, Sullivan, Thomas, Lau, Dennis H., Roberts-Thomson, Kurt C., Brooks, Anthony G., Sanders, Prashanthan·2013·Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background—: Atrial fibrillation ablation is an established therapy; however, limited data are available on associated complications. This systematic review determines the incidence and potential predictors of acute complications. Methods and Results—: Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE for English scientific literature up to the 18th June 2012. A total of 2065 references were retrieved and evaluated for relevance. Reference lists of retrieved studies and review articles were examined to ensure all relevant studies were included. Data were extracted from 192 studies, total of 83 236 patients. The incidence of periprocedural complications for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation was 2.9% (95% confidence interval, 2.6–3.2). There was a significant decrease in the acute complication rate in 2007 to 2012 compared with 2000 to 2006 (2.6% versus 4.0%; P =0.003). The complication rates reported were higher in prospective studies compared with those that retrospectively described complications (3.5% versus 2.7%; P =0.03). There were no significant associations among procedure duration, ablation time or ablation strategy, and acute complication rate. Conclusions—: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation has a low incidence of periprocedural complications. The acute complication rate has decreased significantly in recent years. This may reflect improved catheter technology and experience. The use of different strategies across centers worldwide seems to be safe with no established relationship between procedural variables and complication rate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circep.113.000768

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Gupta, A., Perera, T., Ganesan, A., Sullivan, T., Lau, D. H., Roberts-Thomson, K. C., Brooks, A. G., & Sanders, P.
Venue
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2013-12
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
1082-1088
ISSN
  • 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3149
OpenAlex
W2131039992
Cited by
317
References
10
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circep.113.000768
The paper
Gupta, A., Perera, T., Ganesan, A., Sullivan, T., Lau, D. H., Roberts-Thomson, K. C., Brooks, A. G., & Sanders, P. (2013). Complications of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.113.000768

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.