Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcomes of Contemporary Family Screening in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

van Velzen, Hannah G., Schinkel, Arend F.L., Baart, Sara J., Oldenburg, Rogier A., Frohn-Mulder, Ingrid M.E., van Slegtenhorst, Marjon A., Michels, Michelle·2018·Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine

Abstract

Background: Contemporary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) family screening includes clinical evaluation and genetic testing (GT). This screening strategy requires the identification of a pathogenic mutation in the proband. Our aim was to examine the results of this HCM screening strategy. Methods: Between 1985 and 2016, 777 relatives of 209 probands were assessed in the context of HCM screening. Genotype-positive (G+) relatives and relatives without genetic testing (GT) underwent repeated clinical evaluations. In genotype-negative (G-) relatives mortality was assessed during follow-up. Results: A pathogenic mutation was identified in 72% of probands. After counseling, GT was performed in 620 (80%) relatives: 264 (43%) were G+ (age 41±18 y) and 356 (57%) were G- (age 48±17 y). At first screening, HCM was diagnosed in 98 (37%) G+ relatives and 28 (17%) relatives without GT ( p <0.001). During 9 years follow-up of relatives diagnosed with HCM, 8 (6%) underwent septal reduction therapy, 16 (16%) received primary prevention ICDs, and cardiac mortality was 0.3%/year. During 7 years follow-up of relatives without HCM, 29 (16%) developed HCM. Survival at 5/10 years was 99%/95% in G+ relatives, 97%/94% in G- relatives ( p =0.8), and 100%/100% in relatives without GT. Conclusions: HCM was identified in 30% of relatives at first screening, and 16% developed HCM during 7 years of repeated evaluation. GT led to a discharge from clinical follow-up in 46% of the study population. Survival in the relatives was good.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circgen.117.001896

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.01.019 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu284 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00941-0 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.020 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq271 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/17431380410032526 · DOI
  7. 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31816b5cae · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.echo.2011.03.006 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300368 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq067 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.025 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00466-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001666 · DOI
  14. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001685 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/gim.2015.16 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/cvr/cvv025 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/gim.2017.79 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001620 · DOI
  19. Medical Examination Act. Journal of the State. 1997:636–642.
  20. 10.1038/ejhg.2012.53 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/cvr/cvv023 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.043 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.010 · DOI
  24. 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.3.H1136 · DOI
  25. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000144460.84795.E3 · DOI
  26. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.090514 · DOI
  27. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.111.960831 · DOI
  28. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.967026 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.090 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.044 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00692.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 79

Metadata

Authors
van Velzen, H. G., Schinkel, A. F. L., Baart, S. J., Oldenburg, R. A., Frohn-Mulder, I. M. E., van Slegtenhorst, M. A., & Michels, M.
Venue
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Published
2018-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
ISSN
2574-8300
Cited by
79
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes of Contemporary Family Screening in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circgen.117.001896
The paper
van Velzen, H. G., Schinkel, A. F. L., Baart, S. J., Oldenburg, R. A., Frohn-Mulder, I. M. E., van Slegtenhorst, M. A., & Michels, M. (2018). Outcomes of Contemporary Family Screening in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1161/circgen.117.001896