Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Profile and Significance of Delayed Enhancement in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Open access
Maron, Martin S., Appelbaum, Evan, Harrigan, Caitlin J., Buros, Jacki, Gibson, C. Michael, Hanna, Connie, Lesser, John R., Udelson, James E., Manning, Warren J., Maron, Barry J.·2008·Circulation: Heart Failure

Abstract

Background— Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance with delayed enhancement (DE) can provide in vivo assessment of myocardial fibrosis. However, the clinical significance of DE in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains unresolved. Methods and Results— Cine and cardiovascular magnetic resonance with DE were performed in 202 HCM patients (mean age, 42�17 years; 71% male), DE was compared with clinical and demographic variables, and patients were followed up for 681�249 days for adverse disease events. DE was identified in 111 (55%) HCM patients, occupying 9%�11% of left ventricular myocardial volume, including >25% DE in 10% of patients. The presence of DE was related to occurrence of heart failure symptoms ( P =0.05) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction ( P =0.001). DE was present in all patients with ejection fraction ≤50% but also in 53% (102/192) of patients with preserved ejection fraction ( P <0.001); %DE was both inversely related to ( r =−0.3; P <0.001) and an independent predictor of ejection fraction ( r =−0.4; P <0.001). DE (7%�7% of left ventricle) was present in 54 patients who were asymptomatic (and with normal ejection fraction). Over the follow-up period, the annualized adverse cardiovascular event rate in patients with DE exceeded that in patients without DE but did not achieve statistical significance (5.5% versus 3.3%; P =0.5). Conclusions— In a large HCM cohort, DE was an independent predictor of systolic dysfunction but with only a modest relationship to heart failure symptoms. These data suggest an important role for myocardial fibrosis in the clinical course of HCM patients but are not sufficient at this time to consider DE as an independent risk factor for adverse prognosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circheartfailure.108.768119

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Maron, M. S., Appelbaum, E., Harrigan, C. J., Buros, J., Gibson, C. M., Hanna, C., Lesser, J. R., Udelson, J. E., Manning, W. J., & Maron, B. J.
Venue
Circulation: Heart Failure
Published
2008-09
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
184-191
ISSN
  • 1941-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3297
OpenAlex
W2152980004
Cited by
294
References
1
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Profile and Significance of Delayed Enhancement in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circheartfailure.108.768119
The paper
Maron, M. S., Appelbaum, E., Harrigan, C. J., Buros, J., Gibson, C. M., Hanna, C., Lesser, J. R., Udelson, J. E., Manning, W. J., & Maron, B. J. (2008). Clinical Profile and Significance of Delayed Enhancement in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Circulation: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.108.768119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.