Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outcomes in Advanced Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy

Park, Soon J., Milano, Carmelo A., Tatooles, Antone J., Rogers, Joseph G., Adamson, Robert M., Steidley, D. Eric, Ewald, Gregory A., Sundareswaran, Kartik S., Farrar, David J., Slaughter, Mark S., for the HeartMate II Clinical Investigators†·2012·Circulation: Heart Failure

Abstract

Background—: The HeartMate II (HMII) destination therapy (DT) trial demonstrated significant improvements in outcomes in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices compared with patients implanted with the pulsatile-flow HeartMate XVE. The primary hypothesis of the current study is that trial patients enrolled after the initial data cohort would have better clinical outcomes. Methods and Results—: Two hundred eighty-one patients who underwent HMII for DT from May 2007 to March 2009 (Mid Trial [MT] group) were compared with the initial 133 HMII patients from March 2005 to May 2007 (Early Trial [ET] group). Patient entry criteria were the same during the 2 time periods. Survival, adverse events, and quality of life were compared between the 2 groups. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Compared with the ET group, patients in the MT group had reduced adverse event rates for bleeding requiring transfusions (1.66 versus 1.13 events per patient-year, P <0.001), sepsis (0.38 versus 0.27, P =0.025), device-related infections (0.47 versus 0.27, P <0.001), and hemorrhagic stroke (0.07 versus 0.03, P =0.01). Other event rates were similar between groups including ischemic stroke (0.06 versus 0.05 events per patient-year, P =0.57). Survival at 1 year in the MT group was 73% versus 68% in the ET group ( P =0.21). Additionally, there was a significant reduction in deaths caused by hemorrhagic stroke ( P =0.01). Quality of life improvements were significant in both the groups ( P <0.001). Conclusions—: The benefit of DT therapy with the HMII is confirmed in subsequent trial patients, with improved adverse event rates and a strong trend for improvements in survival. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00121485.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circheartfailure.111.963991

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Park, S. J., Milano, C. A., Tatooles, A. J., Rogers, J. G., Adamson, R. M., Steidley, D. E., Ewald, G. A., Sundareswaran, K. S., Farrar, D. J., Slaughter, M. S., & for the HeartMate II Clinical Investigators†
Venue
Circulation: Heart Failure
Published
2012-03
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
241-248
ISSN
  • 1941-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3297
OpenAlex
W2115244114
Cited by
341
References
1
FWCI
23.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes in Advanced Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circheartfailure.111.963991
The paper
Park, S. J., Milano, C. A., Tatooles, A. J., Rogers, J. G., Adamson, R. M., Steidley, D. E., Ewald, G. A., Sundareswaran, K. S., Farrar, D. J., Slaughter, M. S., & for the HeartMate II Clinical Investigators†. (2012). Outcomes in Advanced Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy. Circulation: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.111.963991

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.