Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comprehensive Validation of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Techniques for the Assessment of Myocardial Extracellular Volume

Miller, Christopher A., Naish, Josephine H., Bishop, Paul, Coutts, Glyn, Clark, David, Zhao, Sha, Ray, Simon G., Yonan, Nizar, Williams, Simon G., Flett, Andrew S., Moon, James C., Greiser, Andreas, Parker, Geoffrey J.M., Schmitt, Matthias·2013·Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

Background—: Extracellular matrix expansion is a key element of ventricular remodeling and a potential therapeutic target. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T 1 -mapping techniques are increasingly used to evaluate myocardial extracellular volume (ECV); however, the most widely applied methods are without histological validation. Our aim was to perform comprehensive validation of (1) dynamic-equilibrium CMR (DynEq-CMR), where ECV is quantified using hematocrit-adjusted myocardial and blood T 1 values measured before and after gadolinium bolus; and (2) isolated measurement of myocardial T 1 , used as an ECV surrogate. Methods and Results—: Whole-heart histological validation was performed using 96 tissue samples, analyzed for picrosirius red collagen volume fraction, obtained from each of 16 segments of the explanted hearts of 6 patients undergoing heart transplantation who had prospectively undergone CMR before transplantation (median interval between CMR and transplantation, 29 days). DynEq-CMR–derived ECV was calculated from T 1 measurements made using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence before and 10 and 15 minutes post contrast. In addition, ECV was measured 2 to 20 minutes post contrast in 30 healthy volunteers. There was a strong linear relationship between DynEq-CMR–derived ECV and histological collagen volume fraction ( P <0.001; within-subject: r =0.745; P <0.001; r 2 =0.555 and between-subject: r =0.945; P <0.01; r 2 =0.893; for ECV calculated using 15-minute postcontrast T 1 ). Correlation was maintained throughout the entire heart. Isolated postcontrast T 1 measurement showed significant within-subject correlation with histological collagen volume fraction ( r =−0.741; P <0.001; r 2 =0.550 for 15-minute postcontrast T 1 ), but between-subject correlations were not significant. DynEq-CMR–derived ECV varied significantly according to contrast dose, myocardial region, and sex. Conclusions—: DynEq-CMR–derived ECV shows a good correlation with histological collagen volume fraction throughout the whole heart. Isolated postcontrast T 1 measurement is insufficient for ECV assessment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circimaging.112.000192

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Miller, C. A., Naish, J. H., Bishop, P., Coutts, G., Clark, D., Zhao, S., Ray, S. G., Yonan, N., Williams, S. G., Flett, A. S., Moon, J. C., Greiser, A., Parker, G. J. M., & Schmitt, M.
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2013-05
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
373-383
ISSN
  • 1941-9651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-0080
OpenAlex
W1993592464
Cited by
384
References
1
FWCI
27.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive Validation of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Techniques for the Assessment of Myocardial Extracellular Volume. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circimaging.112.000192
The paper
Miller, C. A., Naish, J. H., Bishop, P., Coutts, G., Clark, D., Zhao, S., Ray, S. G., Yonan, N., Williams, S. G., Flett, A. S., Moon, J. C., Greiser, A., Parker, G. J. M., & Schmitt, M. (2013). Comprehensive Validation of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Techniques for the Assessment of Myocardial Extracellular Volume. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.112.000192

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.