Cited by 126Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

Relationship Between Focal and Diffuse Fibrosis Assessed by CMR and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Open access
Kanagala, Prathap, Cheng, Adrian S.H., Singh, Anvesha, Khan, Jamal N., Gulsin, Gaurav S., Patel, Prashanth, Gupta, Pankaj, Arnold, Jayanth R. +3 more·2019·JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to assess the presence and extent of focal and diffuse fibrosis in heart failure in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared to asymptomatic control subjects, and the relationship of fibrosis to clinical outcome.Background Myocardial fibrosis has been implicated in the pathophysiology of HFpEF.Methods In this prospective, observational study, 140 subjects of similar age and sex (HFpEF: n = 96; control subjects: n = 44; 73 ± 8 years of age; 49% males) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) imaging and T1 mapping to calculate myocardial extracellular volume indexed to body surface area (iECV) were used to assess fibrosis.Results Patients with HFpEF had more concentric remodeling and worse diastolic function. Focal fibrosis was more frequent in HFpEF subjects (overall: n = 49; infarction: n = 17; nonischemic cases: n = 36; mixed patterns: n = 4) than in control subjects (overall: n = 3). Diffuse fibrosis was also greater in HFpEF subjects than control subjects (iECV: 13.7 ± 4.4 ml/m 2 versus 10.9 ± 2.8 ml/m 2; p < 0.0001). During median follow-up (1,429 days), there were 42 composite events (14 deaths; 28 heart failure hospitalizations) in cases of HFpEF. Myocardial infarction revealed on LGE imaging was a predictor of outcomes on univariate analysis only. With multivariate analysis, iECV (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.689; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.141 to 2.501; p = 0.009) was an independent predictor of outcome along with mitral peak velocity of early filling (E)-to-early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E') (E/E') ratio (HR: 1.716; 95% CI: 1.191 to 2.472; p = 0.004) and prior HF hospitalization (HR: 2.537; 95% CI: 1.090 to 5.902; p = 0.031). iECV was also significantly associated with ventricular/left atrial remodeling and renal dysfunction: right ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed (r = 0.456; p < 0.0001), left ventricular mass/volume (r = 0.348; p = 0.001), maximal left atrial volume indexed (r = 0. 269; p = 0.009), and creatinine (r = 0.271; p = 0.009).Conclusions Both focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis are more prevalent in HFpEF subjects than in control subjects of similar age and sex. iECV significantly correlates with indices of ventricular/left atrial remodeling and renal dysfunction and is an independent predictor of adverse outcome in HFpEF. (Developing Imaging And plasMa biOmarkers iN Describing Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction [DIAMONDHFpEF]; NCT03050593).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.031

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanagala, P., Cheng, A. S. H., Singh, A., Khan, J. N., Gulsin, G. S., Patel, P., Gupta, P., Arnold, J. R., Squire, I. B., Ng, L. L., & McCann, G. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Kanagala, Prathap
Venue
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
2291-2301
ISSN
  • 1876-7591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-878X
OpenAlex
W2912610266
Cited by
126
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 8
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2016-11-001, RP-2017-08-ST2-007, 2014‐07‐045)
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, myocardial fibrosis, focal fibrosis, diffuse fibrosis, extracellular volume, late gadolinium enhancement, T1 mapping, clinical outcomes, heart failure hospitalization, mortality, E/e' ratio, left atrial remodeling, ventricular remodeling, renal dysfunction, myocardial infarction, prognosis, left ventricular mass
MeSH terms
Progression-Free Survival, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Contrast Media, England, Extracellular Space, Female, Fibrosis, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardium, Organometallic Compounds, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Stroke Volume, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Ventricular Function, Left, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Ventricular Remodeling, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review