The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Myosin Inhibition and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Referred for Septal Reduction Therapy: Insights From the VALOR-HCM Study
Abstract
Background: In the randomized phase 3 VALOR-HCM study (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy) of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, mavacamten reduced the need for septal reduction therapy. Because mavacamten improves ventricular compliance, this sub-study examined the effects of treatment with this cardiac myosin inhibitor on diastolic function. Methods: Symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients on maximally tolerated medical therapy referred for septal reduction therapy were randomized 1:1 to mavacamten or placebo. At baseline and week 16, a resting and stress echocardiogram was performed with interpretation by a core laboratory. In this exploratory substudy, the principal end point was the change in parameters used to define the grade of diastolic function in patients treated with mavacamten and placebo. A related objective was to assess the proportion of patients with an improvement in diastolic function grade. A secondary aim was to assess for correlation between diastolic function parameters and the secondary end points from VALOR-HCM: New York Heart Association class, quality of life, and cardiac biomarkers. Results: Diastolic dysfunction grade was evaluable in 98 patients at baseline and week 16. Among patients treated with mavacamten, 29.4% (15 of 51) demonstrated improvement in diastolic function grade compared with 12.8% (6 of 47) patients with placebo ( P =0.05). Average E/e’ ratio decreased significantly in patients treated with mavacamten (−3.4±5.3) compared with placebo (0.57±3.5; P <0.001). Indexed left atrial volumes (mL/m 2 ) also decreased significantly in patients who received mavacamten (−5.2±7.8) compared with placebo (−0.51±8.1; P =0.005). After adjustment for change in left ventricular outflow tract gradient and mitral regurgitation, mavacamten was significantly associated with a decrease in average E/e’ ratio and indexed left atrial volumes. Change in average E/e’ ratio was significantly correlated with the secondary end points from VALOR-HCM. Conclusions: In this exploratory substudy, after 16 weeks of therapy, mavacamten improved diastolic function, and this change correlated with improvement in clinical and biomarker end points. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04349072.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An exploratory substudy from VALOR data suggests that mavacamten improves echocardiographic parameters of diastolic dysfunction.”
From Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (2025) · cites this paper as [151]
Citations
Cites
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Genetics, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Therapy
Marian, A. J., & Braunwald, E. (2017) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.117.311059 · Cited by 1,403
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009026 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa021332 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMra1710575 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/echo.14539 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.09.011 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aad3456 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31792-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.048 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.12.031 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001435 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.10.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318223e230 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.00 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1381 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.698985 · DOI
- 10.1111/echo.13857 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004052 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ehjci/jeac036 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.013556 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Current management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Sikand, N., Stendahl, J., Sen, S., Lampert, R., & Day, S. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-077274 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Cremer, P. C., Geske, J. B., Owens, A., Jaber, W. A., Harb, S. C., Saberi, S., Wang, A., Sherrid, M., Naidu, S. S., Schaff, H., Smedira, N. G., Wang, Q., Wolski, K., Lampl, K. L., Sehnert, A. J., Nissen, S. E., & Desai, M. Y.
- Venue
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 1941-9651
- 1942-0080
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- MyoKardia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review