Cited by 76

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Myosin Inhibition and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Referred for Septal Reduction Therapy: Insights From the VALOR-HCM Study

Cremer, Paul C., Geske, Jeffrey B., Owens, Anjali, Jaber, Wael A., Harb, Serge C., Saberi, Sara, Wang, Andrew, Sherrid, Mark, Naidu, Srihari S., Schaff, Hartzell, Smedira, Nicholas G., Wang, Qiuqing, Wolski, Kathy, Lampl, Kathy L., Sehnert, Amy J., Nissen, Steven E., Desai, Milind Y.·2022·Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

Background: In the randomized phase 3 VALOR-HCM study (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy) of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, mavacamten reduced the need for septal reduction therapy. Because mavacamten improves ventricular compliance, this sub-study examined the effects of treatment with this cardiac myosin inhibitor on diastolic function. Methods: Symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients on maximally tolerated medical therapy referred for septal reduction therapy were randomized 1:1 to mavacamten or placebo. At baseline and week 16, a resting and stress echocardiogram was performed with interpretation by a core laboratory. In this exploratory substudy, the principal end point was the change in parameters used to define the grade of diastolic function in patients treated with mavacamten and placebo. A related objective was to assess the proportion of patients with an improvement in diastolic function grade. A secondary aim was to assess for correlation between diastolic function parameters and the secondary end points from VALOR-HCM: New York Heart Association class, quality of life, and cardiac biomarkers. Results: Diastolic dysfunction grade was evaluable in 98 patients at baseline and week 16. Among patients treated with mavacamten, 29.4% (15 of 51) demonstrated improvement in diastolic function grade compared with 12.8% (6 of 47) patients with placebo ( P =0.05). Average E/e’ ratio decreased significantly in patients treated with mavacamten (−3.4±5.3) compared with placebo (0.57±3.5; P <0.001). Indexed left atrial volumes (mL/m 2 ) also decreased significantly in patients who received mavacamten (−5.2±7.8) compared with placebo (−0.51±8.1; P =0.005). After adjustment for change in left ventricular outflow tract gradient and mitral regurgitation, mavacamten was significantly associated with a decrease in average E/e’ ratio and indexed left atrial volumes. Change in average E/e’ ratio was significantly correlated with the secondary end points from VALOR-HCM. Conclusions: In this exploratory substudy, after 16 weeks of therapy, mavacamten improved diastolic function, and this change correlated with improvement in clinical and biomarker end points. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04349072.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circimaging.122.014986

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009026 · DOI
  2. 10.1056/NEJMoa021332 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1056/NEJMra1710575 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/echo.14539 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.09.011 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.aad3456 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31792-X · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.048 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.12.031 · DOI
  10. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001435 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.10.022 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.05.007 · DOI
  13. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318223e230 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.00 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1381 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.03.002 · DOI
  19. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.698985 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/echo.13857 · DOI
  21. 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004052 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/ehjci/jeac036 · DOI
  24. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.013556 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 76

Metadata

Authors
Cremer, P. C., Geske, J. B., Owens, A., Jaber, W. A., Harb, S. C., Saberi, S., Wang, A., Sherrid, M., Naidu, S. S., Schaff, H., Smedira, N. G., Wang, Q., Wolski, K., Lampl, K. L., Sehnert, A. J., Nissen, S. E., & Desai, M. Y.
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Published
2022-12
Volume
15
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 1941-9651
  • 1942-0080
Cited by
76
References
1
Language
en
Funders
MyoKardia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review