The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Importance of Clinical Trial Data Sharing: Toward More Open Science
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Transparent and reproducible science offers well-established benefits: enhanced research reliability and credibility, increased applicability of results, and reduced bias and waste of resources [10–14].”
From Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“By sharing data and code, additional analyses (which can generate new hypotheses and future research) are enabled, as well as data verifiability [10–12].”
From Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Several major clinical research funders and biomedical journals have adopted policies supporting or mandating the use of reporting guidelines such as CONSORT [10, 17–19], which include encouraging protocol registration, conflict of interest disclosure, and funding.”
From Assessing transparency practices in dental randomized controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death from Cardiovascular Causes
Nissen, S. E., & Wolski, K. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072761 · Cited by 4,675
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy
Turner, E. H., Matthews, A. M., Linardatos, E., Tell, R. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa065779 · Cited by 2,435
Chan, A.-W., Hróbjartsson, A., Haahr, M. T., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Altman, D. G. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.20.2457 · Cited by 1,845
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., Bloom, J., Chan, A.-W., Cronin, E., Decullier, E., Easterbrook, P. J., Von Elm, E., Gamble, C., et al. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003081 · Cited by 1,546
Simvastatin with or without Ezetimibe in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Kastelein, J. J. P., Akdim, F., Stroes, E. S. G., Zwinderman, A. H., Bots, M. L., Stalenhoef, A. F. H., Visseren, F. L. J., Sijbrands, E. J. G., Trip, M. D., Stein, E. A., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0800742 · Cited by 1,241
Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results
Dickersin, K. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480030052036 · Cited by 931
Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
Ross, J. S., Mulvey, G. K., Hines, E. M., Nissen, S. E., & Krumholz, H. M. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000144 · Cited by 401
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–104 of 104
Research transparency in articles published in orthodontic journals: is it clear?
Yii, M. C. H., Cobourne, M. T., Pandis, N., & Seehra, J. (2025) · European Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjaf028
Liu, Y., Lip, G. Y. H., Zhang, J., Bai, X., Li, J., Thabane, L., Spall, H. G. C. V., & Li, G. (2025) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05510-x
Hohlfeld, A., Kredo, T., & Clarke, M. J. (2026) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-026-00207-0
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, J. S., Lehman, R., & Gross, C. P.
- Affiliations
- Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-240
- ISSN
- 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7713
- PMC
- PMC3318983
- OpenAlex
- W2142147900
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K08AG032886)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
- Keywords
- clinical trial data sharing, data transparency, cardiovascular clinical trials, research data access
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Science, United States, Information Dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
