Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mortality of Myocardial Infarction by Sex, Age, and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Status in the ACTION Registry–GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With the Guidelines)

Open access
Smilowitz, Nathaniel R., Mahajan, Asha M., Roe, Matthew T., Hellkamp, Anne S., Chiswell, Karen, Gulati, Martha, Reynolds, Harmony R.·2017·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background—: Sex differences in early mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) vary by age. MI with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA [<50% stenosis]) is more common among younger patients and women, and MINOCA has a better prognosis than MI with obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD). The relationship between age, sex, and obstructive CAD status and outcomes post-MI has not been established. Methods and Results—: Adults who underwent coronary angiography for acute ST-segment–elevation and non–ST-segment–elevation MI in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With the Guidelines) from 2007 to 2014 were identified. Patients with cardiac arrest, thrombolytic therapy, prior revascularization, or missing demographic or angiographic data were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events. Demographics, clinical history, presentation, and in-hospital treatments were compared by sex and CAD status (MI-CAD or MINOCA). Mortality and major adverse cardiovascular outcomes were analyzed by age, sex, and CAD status. Among 322 523 patients with MI, MINOCA occurred in 18 918 (5.9%). MINOCA was more common in women than men (10.5% versus 3.4%; P <0.0001), and women had higher mortality than men overall (3.6% versus 2.4%; P <0.0001). In-hospital mortality was lower after MINOCA than MI-CAD (1.1% versus 2.9%; P <0.0001). Among patients with MI-CAD, women had higher mortality than men (3.9% versus 2.4%; P <0.0001) while no sex difference in mortality was observed with MINOCA (1.1% versus 1.0%; P =0.84). The higher risk of post-MI death among women with MI-CAD was most pronounced at younger ages. Conclusions—: MINOCA was associated with lower mortality than MI-CAD. Higher risk of post-MI death among women in comparison to men was restricted to patients with MI-CAD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.116.003443

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Smilowitz, N. R., Mahajan, A. M., Roe, M. T., Hellkamp, A. S., Chiswell, K., Gulati, M., & Reynolds, H. R.
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2017-12
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
e003443-e003443
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2772013107
Cited by
351
References
1
FWCI
15.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality of Myocardial Infarction by Sex, Age, and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Status in the ACTION Registry–GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With the Guidelines). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circoutcomes.116.003443
The paper
Smilowitz, N. R., Mahajan, A. M., Roe, M. T., Hellkamp, A. S., Chiswell, K., Gulati, M., & Reynolds, H. R. (2017). Mortality of Myocardial Infarction by Sex, Age, and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Status in the ACTION Registry–GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry–Get With the Guidelines). Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.116.003443

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.