Automated and interpretable patient ECG profiles for disease detection, tracking, and discovery
Open accessAbstract
Background: The ECG remains the most widely used diagnostic test for characterization of cardiac structure and electrical activity. We hypothesized that parallel advances in computing power, machine learning algorithms, and availability of large-scale data could substantially expand the clinical inferences derived from the ECG while at the same time preserving interpretability for medical decision-making. Methods and Results: We identified 36 186 ECGs from the University of California, San Francisco database that would enable training of models for estimation of cardiac structure or function or detection of disease. We segmented the ECG into standard component waveforms and intervals using a novel combination of convolutional neural networks and hidden Markov models and evaluated this segmentation by comparing resulting electrical intervals against 141 864 measurements produced during the clinical workflow. We then built a patient-level ECG profile, a 725-element feature vector and used this profile to train and interpret machine learning models for examples of cardiac structure (left ventricular mass, left atrial volume, and mitral annulus e-prime) and disease (pulmonary arterial hypertension, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloid, and mitral valve prolapse). ECG measurements derived from the convolutional neural network-hidden Markov model segmentation agreed with clinical estimates, with median absolute deviations as a fraction of observed value of 0.6% for heart rate and 4% for QT interval. Models trained using patient-level ECG profiles enabled surprising quantitative estimates of left ventricular mass and mitral annulus e′ velocity (median absolute deviation of 16% and 19%, respectively) with good discrimination for left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction as binary traits. Model performance using our approach for disease detection demonstrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.94 for pulmonary arterial hypertension, 0.91 for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 0.86 for cardiac amyloid, and 0.77 for mitral valve prolapse. Conclusions: Modern machine learning methods can extend the 12-lead ECG to quantitative applications well beyond its current uses while preserving the transparency that is so fundamental to clinical care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ECG waveforms contain latent signatures of structural heart disease.
“Emerging evidence suggests that ECG waveforms contain latent signatures of ventricular dysfunction [4], structural heart disease [5], metabolic abnormalities [6], and broader physiologic characteristics such as biological age [7] and future mortality risk [8].”
From Deep Learning Applied to 12-Lead ECGs for Detection of Structural, Metabolic and Systemic Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Both human and computerized ECG interpretation may overlook subtle or distributed signals related to cardiac structure, function, and systemic physiology.
“Consequently, both human and computerized interpretation may overlook subtle or distributed signals related to cardiac structure, function, and systemic physiology [5].”
From Deep Learning Applied to 12-Lead ECGs for Detection of Structural, Metabolic and Systemic Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Tison et al. [152]'s vectorized processing approach better retained meaningful features in ECGs, enhancing interpretability and accuracy compared to traditional neural network models.
“Compared to traditional neural network models, this vectorized processing approach better retained meaningful features in ECGs, thus enhancing the interpretability and accuracy of diagnostic results.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis (2024) · cites this paper as [152]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 208
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [14]Ronneberger O Fischer P Brox T U-Net: Convolutional Networks For Biomedical Image Segmentation. Accessed April 1, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597 · arXiv
- [20]Abadi M Barham P Chen J Chen Z Davis A Dean J Devin M Ghemawat S Irving G Isard M Kudlur M Levenberg J Monga R Moore S Murray DG Steiner B Tucker P Vasudevan V Warden P Wicke M Yuan Y Zheng X Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning. OSDI 2016 16 265 283
- Authors
- Tison, G. H., Zhang, J., Delling, F. N., & Deo, R. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Deo, Rahul C.
- Venue
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e005289-e005289
- ISSN
- 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7713
- PMC
- PMC6951431
- OpenAlex
- W2831775039
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 16.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (DP2HL123228, R01HL140731, K23HL135274)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- electrocardiogram, ECG segmentation, convolutional neural networks, hidden Markov models, left ventricular mass, left atrial volume, pulmonary arterial hypertension, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, mitral valve prolapse, disease detection, interpretability, left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, QT interval
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Action Potentials, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrocardiography, Heart Rate, Humans, Markov Chains, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Workflow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review