The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Novel and Efficient Model of Coronary Artery Ligation and Myocardial Infarction in the Mouse
Open accessAbstract
Rationale: Coronary artery ligation to induce myocardial infarction (MI) in mice is typically performed by an invasive and time-consuming approach that requires ventilation and chest opening (classic method), often resulting in extensive tissue damage and high mortality. We developed a novel and rapid surgical method to induce MI that does not require ventilation. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and comprehensively describe this method and directly compare it to the classic method. Methods and Results: Male C57/B6 mice were grouped into 4 groups: new method MI (MI-N) or sham (S-N) and classic method MI (MI-C) or sham (S-C). In the new method, heart was manually exposed without intubation through a small incision and MI was induced. In the classic method, MI was induced through a ventilated thoracotomy. Similar groups were used in an ischemia/reperfusion injury model. This novel MI procedure is rapid, with an average procedure time of 1.22±0.05 minutes, whereas the classic method requires 23.2±0.6 minutes per procedure. Surgical mortality was 3% in MI-N and 15.9% in MI-C. The rate of arrhythmia was significantly lower in MI-N. The postsurgical levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and myeloperoxidase were lower in new method, indicating less inflammation. Overall, 28-day post-MI survival rate was 68% with MI-N and 48% with MI-C. Importantly, there was no difference in infarct size or post-MI cardiac function between the methods. Conclusions: This new rapid method of MI in mice represents a more efficient and less damaging model of myocardial ischemic injury compared with the classic method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, T., Zhang, Z., Kolwicz, S. C., Abell, L., Roe, N. D., Kim, M., Zhou, B., Cao, Y., Ritterhoff, J., Gu, H., et al. (2017) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.11.005 · Cited by 401
The mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ exchanger is essential for Ca2+ homeostasis and viability
Luongo, T. S., Lambert, J. P., Gross, P., Nwokedi, M., Lombardi, A. A., Shanmughapriya, S., Carpenter, A. C., Kolmetzky, D., Gao, E., van Berlo, J. H., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22082 · Cited by 396
Self-citationLuongo, T. S., Lambert, J. P., Yuan, A., Zhang, X., Gross, P., Song, J., Shanmughapriya, S., Gao, E., Jain, M., Houser, S. R., et al. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.017 · Cited by 384
Self-citationCai, S., Zhao, M., Zhou, B., Yoshii, A., Bugg, D., Villet, O., Sahu, A., Olson, G. S., Davis, J., & Tian, R. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci159498 · Cited by 282
Senescent Cardiac Fibroblast Is Critical for Cardiac Fibrosis after Myocardial Infarction
Zhu, F., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Piao, C., Liu, T., Li, H.-H., & Du, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074535 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, E., Lei, Y. H., Shang, X., Huang, Z. M., Zuo, L., Boucher, M., Fan, Q., Chuprun, J. K., Ma, X. L., & Koch, W. J.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 2010-12-10
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1445-1453
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2019922945
- Cited by
- 760
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel and Efficient Model of Coronary Artery Ligation and Myocardial Infarction in the Mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circresaha.110.223925
- The paper
- Gao, E., Lei, Y. H., Shang, X., Huang, Z. M., Zuo, L., Boucher, M., Fan, Q., Chuprun, J. K., Ma, X. L., & Koch, W. J. (2010). A Novel and Efficient Model of Coronary Artery Ligation and Myocardial Infarction in the Mouse. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.110.223925
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.