Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 760

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Novel and Efficient Model of Coronary Artery Ligation and Myocardial Infarction in the Mouse

Open access
Gao, Erhe, Lei, Yong Hong, Shang, Xiying, Huang, Z. Maggie, Zuo, Lin, Boucher, Matthieu, Fan, Qian, Chuprun, J. Kurt, Ma, Xin L., Koch, Walter J.·2010·Circulation Research

Abstract

Rationale: Coronary artery ligation to induce myocardial infarction (MI) in mice is typically performed by an invasive and time-consuming approach that requires ventilation and chest opening (classic method), often resulting in extensive tissue damage and high mortality. We developed a novel and rapid surgical method to induce MI that does not require ventilation. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and comprehensively describe this method and directly compare it to the classic method. Methods and Results: Male C57/B6 mice were grouped into 4 groups: new method MI (MI-N) or sham (S-N) and classic method MI (MI-C) or sham (S-C). In the new method, heart was manually exposed without intubation through a small incision and MI was induced. In the classic method, MI was induced through a ventilated thoracotomy. Similar groups were used in an ischemia/reperfusion injury model. This novel MI procedure is rapid, with an average procedure time of 1.22±0.05 minutes, whereas the classic method requires 23.2±0.6 minutes per procedure. Surgical mortality was 3% in MI-N and 15.9% in MI-C. The rate of arrhythmia was significantly lower in MI-N. The postsurgical levels of tumor necrosis factor-α and myeloperoxidase were lower in new method, indicating less inflammation. Overall, 28-day post-MI survival rate was 68% with MI-N and 48% with MI-C. Importantly, there was no difference in infarct size or post-MI cardiac function between the methods. Conclusions: This new rapid method of MI in mice represents a more efficient and less damaging model of myocardial ischemic injury compared with the classic method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.110.223925

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 760

Metadata

Authors
Gao, E., Lei, Y. H., Shang, X., Huang, Z. M., Zuo, L., Boucher, M., Fan, Q., Chuprun, J. K., Ma, X. L., & Koch, W. J.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2010-12-10
Volume
107
Issue
12
Pages
1445-1453
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2019922945
Cited by
760
References
0
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel and Efficient Model of Coronary Artery Ligation and Myocardial Infarction in the Mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circresaha.110.223925
The paper
Gao, E., Lei, Y. H., Shang, X., Huang, Z. M., Zuo, L., Boucher, M., Fan, Q., Chuprun, J. K., Ma, X. L., & Koch, W. J. (2010). A Novel and Efficient Model of Coronary Artery Ligation and Myocardial Infarction in the Mouse. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.110.223925

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.