The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Historical Perspective on the Pathology of Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury
Open accessAbstract
A selective history of the pathophysiological, structural, and metabolic changes found during an episode of severe myocardial ischemia in the canine heart is presented. The changes that cause ischemic injury to become irreversible are discussed in detail because these changes are the target of any successful therapy designed to prevent ischemic cell death. Of these, the disruption of the sarcolemma, an injury the development of which is accelerated in vivo by the contraction of viable tissue elsewhere in the heart traumatizing the ischemic area, plus the changes in high-energy phosphate and the total adenine nucleotide pool are considered to be the critical events leading to the development of irreversibility. The discovery of preconditioning with ischemia is discussed, together with a brief description of postconditioning. Finally, reperfusion injury is discussed in a summary fashion. The evidence for the fact that myocytes are salvaged by reperfusion is presented, as is the evidence that myocytes become unsalvageable by reperfusion as the duration of ischemia increases. The concept that some of the myocytes that die after successful reperfusion with arterial blood actually are killed by changes initiated by reperfusion, so-called lethal reperfusion injury, is attractive in that prevention of this change would lead to greater salvage; however, the prevalence of this phenomenon in clinical practice remains to be determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The “no-reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog
Kloner, R. A., Ganote, C. E., & Jennings, R. B. (1974) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci107898 · Cited by 1,842
Self-citationPreconditioning the myocardium: from cellular physiology to clinical cardiology
YELLON, D. M., & DOWNEY, J. M. (2003) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00009.2003 · Cited by 1,062
Cited by
Kalogeris, T., Baines, C. P., Krenz, M., & Korthuis, R. J. (2016) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c160006 · Cited by 718
Heusch, G., & Gersh, B. J. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw224 · Cited by 676
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Vogel, B., Claessen, B. E., Arnold, S. V., Chan, D., Cohen, D. J., Giannitsis, E., Gibson, C. M., Goto, S., Katus, H. A., Kerneis, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0090-3 · Cited by 419
Cardiac MRI Endpoints in Myocardial Infarction Experimental and Clinical Trials
Ibanez, B., Aletras, A. H., Arai, A. E., Arheden, H., Bax, J., Berry, C., Bucciarelli-Ducci, C., Croisille, P., Dall'Armellina, E., Dharmakumar, R., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.024 · Cited by 369
(2019) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Jennings, R. B.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 2013-08-02
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 428-438
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2117981319
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Historical Perspective on the Pathology of Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circresaha.113.300987
- The paper
- Jennings, R. B. (2013). Historical Perspective on the Pathology of Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.113.300987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.