Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 522

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Vivo Quantitative Measurement of Intact Fibrous Cap and Lipid-Rich Necrotic Core Size in Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque: Comparison of High-Resolution, Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histology

Open access
Cai, Jianming, Hatsukami, Thomas S., Ferguson, Marina S., Kerwin, William S., Saam, Tobias, Chu, Baocheng, Takaya, Norihide, Polissar, Nayak L., Yuan, Chun·2005·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Previous studies with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) have shown that the fibrous cap (FC) in atherosclerotic carotid plaques enhances with gadolinium-based contrast agents. Conversely, the lipid-rich necrotic core (LR-NC), lacking both vasculature and matrix, shows no or only slight enhancement. The goal of this study was to assess whether CEMRI can be used to accurately measure the dimensions of the intact FC and LR-NC. Methods and Results— Twenty-one patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy were imaged with a 1.5-T scanner. Precontrast images and CEMRI were obtained. One hundred eight locations with an intact FC were matched between MRI and the excised histology specimens. Quantitative measurements of FC length along the lumen circumference, FC area, and LR-NC area were collected from CEMRI images and histology sections. Blinded comparison of corresponding MR images and histology slices showed moderate to good correlation for length ( r =0.73, P <0.001) and area ( r =0.80, P <0.001) of the intact FC. The mean percentage LR-NC areas (LR-NC area/wall area) measured by CEMRI and histology were 30.1% and 32.7%, respectively, and were strongly correlated across locations ( r =0.87, P <0.001). Conclusions— In vivo high-resolution CEMRI is capable of quantitatively measuring the dimensions of the intact FC and LR-NC. These new parameters may be useful to evaluate plaque vulnerability and provide continuous variables for characterizing the intact FC and LR-NC in progression and regression studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.104.528174

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 522

Metadata

Authors
Cai, J., Hatsukami, T. S., Ferguson, M. S., Kerwin, W. S., Saam, T., Chu, B., Takaya, N., Polissar, N. L., & Yuan, C.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2005-11-29
Volume
112
Issue
22
Pages
3437-3444
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2027423064
Cited by
522
References
27
FWCI
16.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vivo Quantitative Measurement of Intact Fibrous Cap and Lipid-Rich Necrotic Core Size in Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque: Comparison of High-Resolution, Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.104.528174
The paper
Cai, J., Hatsukami, T. S., Ferguson, M. S., Kerwin, W. S., Saam, T., Chu, B., Takaya, N., Polissar, N. L., & Yuan, C. (2005). In Vivo Quantitative Measurement of Intact Fibrous Cap and Lipid-Rich Necrotic Core Size in Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque: Comparison of High-Resolution, Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histology. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.104.528174

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.