Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

N-Terminal Pro–Brain Natriuretic Peptide or Troponin Testing Followed by Echocardiography for Risk Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Binder, Lutz, Pieske, Burkert, Olschewski, Manfred, Geibel, Annette, Klostermann, Beate, Reiner, Christian, Konstantinides, Stavros·2005·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal (NT)-proBNP have recently emerged as promising parameters for risk assessment in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, their positive predictive value is low, and the prognostic implications of NT-proBNP or troponin elevation alone are questionable. Methods and Results— To determine whether the combination of NT-proBNP testing with echocardiography may identify both low-risk and high-risk patients with PE, we examined 124 consecutive patients with proved PE. All underwent echocardiography on admission to detect right ventricular dysfunction. NT-proBNP and troponin concentrations were measured in one core laboratory. The primary end point was death or major in-hospital complications. The cutoff level of 1000 pg/mL had a high negative predictive value (95% for a complicated course, 100% for death), but NT-proBNP ≥1000 pg/mL did not independently predict an adverse outcome. Combination of NT-proBNP testing with echocardiography identified 3 major risk groups. A positive echocardiogram was associated with a 12-fold elevation in complication risk compared with patients with low NT-proBNP ( P =0.002), whereas NT-proBNP elevation without right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography only slightly increased the risk of an adverse outcome ( P =0.17). The combination of cardiac troponin testing with echocardiography yielded similar complication rates in the lowest-risk group and a similar magnitude of risk elevation for the highest-risk patients, but it also increased the number of intermediate-risk groups. Conclusions— Our results support a simple risk stratification algorithm for patients with PE, with the use of NT-proBNP or troponin testing as an initial step that should be followed by echocardiography if elevated levels of the biomarker are found.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.105.552216

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Binder, L., Pieske, B., Olschewski, M., Geibel, A., Klostermann, B., Reiner, C., & Konstantinides, S.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2005-09-13
Volume
112
Issue
11
Pages
1573-1579
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2146370419
Cited by
304
References
25
FWCI
17.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: N-Terminal Pro–Brain Natriuretic Peptide or Troponin Testing Followed by Echocardiography for Risk Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.552216
The paper
Binder, L., Pieske, B., Olschewski, M., Geibel, A., Klostermann, B., Reiner, C., & Konstantinides, S. (2005). N-Terminal Pro–Brain Natriuretic Peptide or Troponin Testing Followed by Echocardiography for Risk Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.552216

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.