The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Administrative Claims Model Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day Mortality Rates Among Patients With Heart Failure
Open accessAbstract
Background— A model using administrative claims data that is suitable for profiling hospital performance for heart failure would be useful in quality assessment and improvement efforts. Methods and Results— We developed a hierarchical regression model using Medicare claims data from 1998 that produces hospital risk-standardized 30-day mortality rates. We validated the model by comparing state-level standardized estimates with state-level standardized estimates calculated from a medical record model. To determine the stability of the model over time, we used annual Medicare cohorts discharged in 1999–2001. The final model included 24 variables and had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70. In the derivation set from 1998, the 25th and 75th percentiles of the risk-standardized mortality rates across hospitals were 11.6% and 12.8%, respectively. The 95th percentile was 14.2%, and the 5th percentile was 10.5%. In the validation samples, the 5th and 95th percentiles of risk-standardized mortality rates across states were 9.9% and 13.9%, respectively. Correlation between risk-standardized state mortality rates from claims data and rates derived from medical record data was 0.95 (SE=0.015). The slope of the weighted regression line from the 2 data sources was 0.76 (SE=0.04) with intercept of 0.03 (SE=0.004). The median difference between the claims-based state risk-standardized estimates and the chart-based rates was <0.001 (25th percentile=−0.003; 75th percentile=0.002). The performance of the model was stable over time. Conclusions— This administrative claims-based model produces estimates of risk-standardized state mortality that are very good surrogates for estimates derived from a medical record model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bueno, H. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.748 · Cited by 710
Krumholz, H. M., Merrill, A. R., Schone, E. M., Schreiner, G. C., Chen, J., Bradley, E. H., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Lin, Z., Straube, B. M., et al. (2009) · Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.109.883256 · Cited by 580
Self-citationInterpretable Representation Learning for Healthcare via Capturing Disease Progression through Time
Bai, T., Zhang, S., Egleston, B. L., & Vucetic, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3219819.3219904 · Cited by 180
Sud, M., Yu, B., Wijeysundera, H. C., Austin, P. C., Ko, D. T., Braga, J., Cram, P., Spertus, J. A., Domanski, M., & Lee, D. S. (2017) · JACC Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2017.03.012 · Cited by 135
Tabak, Y. P., Sun, X., Nunez, C. M., & Johannes, R. S. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001790 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Krumholz, H. M., Wang, Y., Mattera, J. A., Wang, Y., Han, L. F., Ingber, M. J., Roman, S., & Normand, S.-L. T.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2006-04-04
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1693-1701
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2135157036
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Administrative Claims Model Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day Mortality Rates Among Patients With Heart Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.105.611194
- The paper
- Krumholz, H. M., Wang, Y., Mattera, J. A., Wang, Y., Han, L. F., Ingber, M. J., Roman, S., & Normand, S.-L. T. (2006). An Administrative Claims Model Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day Mortality Rates Among Patients With Heart Failure. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.611194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.