Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Open access
Eikelboom, John W., Mehta, Shamir R., Anand, Sonia S., Xie, Changchun, Fox, Keith A.A., Yusuf, Salim·2006·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The use of multiple antithrombotic drugs and aggressive invasive strategies has increased the risk of major bleeding in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. It is not known to what extent bleeding determines clinical outcome. Methods and Results— Using Cox proportional-hazards modeling, we examined the association between bleeding and death or ischemic events in 34 146 patients with ACS enrolled in the Organization to Assess Ischemic Syndromes and the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events studies. Patients with major bleeding were older, more often had diabetes or a history of stroke, had a lower blood pressure and higher serum creatinine, more often had ST-segment changes on the presenting ECG, and had a 5-fold-higher incidence of death during the first 30 days (12.8% versus 2.5%; P <0.0001) and a 1.5-fold-higher incidence of death between 30 days and 6 months (4.6% versus 2.9%; P =0.002). Major bleeding was independently associated with an increased hazard of death during the first 30 days (hazard ratio, 5.37; 95% CI, 3.97 to 7.26; P <0.0001), but the hazard was much weaker after 30 days (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.36; P =0.047). The association was consistent across subgroups according to cointerventions during hospitalization, and there was an increasing risk of death with increasing severity of bleeding (minor less than major less than life-threatening; P for trend=0.0009). A similar association was evident between major bleeding and ischemic events, including myocardial infarction and stroke. Conclusions— In ACS patients without persistent ST-segment elevation, there is a strong, consistent, temporal, and dose-related association between bleeding and death. These data should lead to greater awareness of the prognostic importance of bleeding in ACS and should prompt evaluation of strategies to reduce bleeding and thereby improve clinical outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.106.612812

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,341

Metadata

Authors
Eikelboom, J. W., Mehta, S. R., Anand, S. S., Xie, C., Fox, K. A. A., & Yusuf, S.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2006-08-22
Volume
114
Issue
8
Pages
774-782
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2099409915
Cited by
1,341
References
2
FWCI
52.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.106.612812
The paper
Eikelboom, J. W., Mehta, S. R., Anand, S. S., Xie, C., Fox, K. A. A., & Yusuf, S. (2006). Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.612812

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.