Cited by 245Smoking Behavior and CessationAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCardiac Health and Mental Health

Reduction in the Incidence of Acute Myocardial Infarction Associated With a Citywide Smoking Ordinance

Bartecchi, Carl, Alsever, Robert N., Nevin-Woods, Christine, Thomas, William M., Estacio, Raymond O., Bartelson, Becki Bucher, Krantz, Mori J.·2006·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Secondhand smoke exposure increases the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). One study (Helena, Mont) examined the issue and found a decrease in AMI associated with a smoke-free ordinance. We sought to determine the impact of a smoke-free ordinance on AMI admission rates in another geographically isolated community (Pueblo, Colo). Methods and Results— We assessed AMI hospitalizations in Pueblo during a 3-year period, 1.5 years before and 1.5 years after implementation of a smoke-free ordinance. We compared the AMI hospitalization rates among individuals residing within city limits, the area where the ordinance applied, versus those outside city limits. We also compared AMI rates during this time period with another geographically isolated but proximal community, El Paso County, Colo, that did not have an ordinance. A total of 855 patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of primary AMI in Pueblo between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2004. A reduction in AMI hospitalizations was observed in the period after the ordinance among Pueblo city limit residents (relative risk [RR]=0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 0.85). No significant changes in AMI rates were observed among residents outside city limits (RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.16) or in El Paso County during the same period (RR=0.97, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.06). The reduction in AMI rate within Pueblo differed significantly from changes in the external control group (El Paso County) even after adjustment for seasonal trends ( P <0.001). Conclusions— A public ordinance reducing exposure to secondhand smoke was associated with a decrease in AMI hospitalizations in Pueblo, Colo, which supports previous data from a smaller study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.106.615245

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 245

Authors
Bartecchi, C., Alsever, R. N., Nevin-Woods, C., Thomas, W. M., Estacio, R. O., Bartelson, B. B., & Krantz, M. J.
Affiliations
St. Mary-Corwin Medical Center (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2006-10-03
Volume
114
Issue
14
Pages
1490-1496
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2000189854
Cited by
245
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
21.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
acute myocardial infarction, smoke-free policies, passive smoking, hospitalization rates, Pueblo, Colorado, El Paso County, Colorado, community-based intervention, cardiovascular disease prevention
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Colorado, Hospitalization, Humans, Myocardial Infarction, Public Policy, Smoke, Smoking, Urban Population, Incidence, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review