The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Prehospital Induction of Mild Hypothermia in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients With a Rapid Infusion of 4°C Normal Saline
Abstract
Background— Although delayed hospital cooling has been demonstrated to improve outcome after cardiac arrest, in-field cooling started immediately after the return of spontaneous circulation may be more beneficial. The aims of the present pilot study were to assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of in-field cooling. Methods and Results— We determined the effect on esophageal temperature, before hospital arrival, of infusing up to 2 L of 4°C normal saline as soon as possible after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A total of 125 such patients were randomized to receive standard care with or without intravenous cooling. Of the 63 patients randomized to cooling, 49 (78%) received an infusion of 500 to 2000 mL of 4°C normal saline before hospital arrival. These 63 patients experienced a mean temperature decrease of 1.24±1°C with a hospital arrival temperature of 34.7°C, whereas the 62 patients not randomized to cooling experienced a mean temperature increase of 0.10±0.94°C ( P <0.0001) with a hospital arrival temperature of 35.7°C. In-field cooling was not associated with adverse consequences in terms of blood pressure, heart rate, arterial oxygenation, evidence for pulmonary edema on initial chest x-ray, or rearrest. Secondary end points of awakening and discharged alive from hospital trended toward improvement in ventricular fibrillation patients randomized to in-field cooling. Conclusions— These pilot data suggest that infusion of up to 2 L of 4°C normal saline in the field is feasible, safe, and effective in lowering temperature. We propose that the effect of this cooling method on neurological outcome after cardiac arrest be studied in larger numbers of patients, especially those whose initial rhythm is ventricular fibrillation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1002/ana.410130103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1067/mem.2003.149 · doi:10.1067/mem.2003.149
- Longstreth WT Jr. Brain resuscitation after cardiopulmonary arrest. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1988; 39: 115–119.
- 10.1212/WNL.59.4.506 · doi:10.1212/wnl.59.4.506
- 10.1056/NEJMoa012689 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa003289 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00003246-199309000-00019 · doi:10.1097/00003246-199309000-00019
- 10.1161/01.cir.0000131940.19833.85 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1161/circulationaha.106.613349 · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.613349
- 10.1097/01.CCM.0000115263.08805.EF · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000115263.08805.ef
- 10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00276-9 · doi:10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00276-9
- 10.1161/circulationaha.105.544528 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.023 · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.023
- 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.09.014 · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.09.014
Cited by
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: prehospital management
Ong, M. E. H., Perkins, G. D., & Cariou, A. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30316-7 · Cited by 226
Wallach, J. D., Sullivan, P. G., Trepanowski, J. F., Sainani, K. L., Steyerberg, E. W., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9125 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, F., Olsufka, M., Longstreth, W. T., Maynard, C., Carlbom, D., Deem, S., Kudenchuk, P., Copass, M. K., & Cobb, L. A.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2007-06-19
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3064-3070
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2111514631
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.