Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-Sectional Correlates of Increased Aortic Stiffness in the Community: The Framingham Heart Study

Open access
Mitchell, Gary F., Guo, Chao-Yu, Benjamin, Emelia J., Larson, Martin G., Keyes, Michelle J., Vita, Joseph A., Vasan, Ramachandran S., Levy, Daniel·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Increased aortic stiffness is associated with numerous common diseases of aging, including heart disease, stroke, and renal disease. However, the prevalence and correlates of abnormally high aortic stiffness are incompletely understood. Methods and Results— We evaluated 2 aortic stiffness measures, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and forward pressure wave amplitude, in a pooled sample of the Framingham Original, Offspring, and minority Omni cohorts (mean age, 62 years; 56% women). Abnormal stiffness of each measure was defined as a value exceeding the sex-specific 90th percentile of a reference group with a low burden of conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors. Applying this criterion to the entire sample identified a 24% to 33% prevalence of abnormal stiffness measures. The prevalence of abnormal stiffness increased markedly with age, eg, for pulse wave velocity, from a few percent in both sexes aged <50 years to 64% (men) to 74% (women) in those aged ≥70 years. With adjustment for age, important correlates of abnormal aortic stiffness included higher mean arterial pressure, greater body mass index, impaired glucose metabolism, and abnormal lipids. Correlates of aortic stiffness were similar if we used age-specific rather than fixed criteria for defining abnormal stiffness. Conclusions— The prevalence of abnormal aortic stiffness increases steeply with advancing age in the community, especially in the presence of obesity or diabetes. Our data suggest that the burden of disease attributable to aortic stiffness is likely to increase considerably over the next few years as the population ages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.106.667733

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Mitchell, G. F., Guo, C.-Y., Benjamin, E. J., Larson, M. G., Keyes, M. J., Vita, J. A., Vasan, R. S., & Levy, D.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-05-22
Volume
115
Issue
20
Pages
2628-2636
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2027967596
Cited by
265
References
3
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-Sectional Correlates of Increased Aortic Stiffness in the Community: The Framingham Heart Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.106.667733
The paper
Mitchell, G. F., Guo, C.-Y., Benjamin, E. J., Larson, M. G., Keyes, M. J., Vita, J. A., Vasan, R. S., & Levy, D. (2007). Cross-Sectional Correlates of Increased Aortic Stiffness in the Community: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.667733

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.