Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Small or Large Isolation Areas Around the Pulmonary Veins for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?: Results From a Prospective Randomized Study

Arentz, Thomas, Weber, Reinhold, Bürkle, Gerd, Herrera, Claudia, Blum, Thomas, Stockinger, Jochem, Minners, Jan, Neumann, Franz Josef, Kalusche, Dietrich·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is a promising new treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that isolation of large areas around both ipsilateral PVs with verification of conduction block is more effective than the isolation of each individual PV. Methods and Results— A total of 110 patients, 67 with paroxysmal AF and 43 with persistent AF, were randomly assigned to undergo either isolation of each individual PV or isolation of large areas around both ipsilateral PVs. The isolation of each individual PV was an electrophysiologically guided, ostial segmental ablation with a 64-pole basket catheter or a 20-pole circular mapping catheter (group I). Isolation of large areas was performed around the 2 ipsilateral veins with a nonfluoroscopic navigation system and a circular 20-pole mapping catheter for verification of conduction block (group II). In both groups, an irrigated-tip ablation catheter (25 to 35 W) was used to achieve complete isolation. Procedure and ablation times were longer in group II, whereas fluoroscopic time was significantly shorter ( P ≤0.001). After a follow-up period of 15±4 months, 27 patients in group I (49%) and 37 patients in group II (67%) remained free of symptoms of AF and had no AF or atrial flutter during repetitive Holter monitoring without antiarrhythmic drug treatment after a single procedure ( P ≤0.05). Conclusions— The rate of success was significantly higher and fluoroscopy times were significantly lower in the group with large isolation areas around both ipsilateral PVs than in those who underwent individual PV isolation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.690578

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
Arentz, T., Weber, R., Bürkle, G., Herrera, C., Blum, T., Stockinger, J., Minners, J., Neumann, F. J., & Kalusche, D.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-06-19
Volume
115
Issue
24
Pages
3057-3063
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W1966613637
Cited by
352
References
0
FWCI
17.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small or Large Isolation Areas Around the Pulmonary Veins for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?: Results From a Prospective Randomized Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.690578
The paper
Arentz, T., Weber, R., Bürkle, G., Herrera, C., Blum, T., Stockinger, J., Minners, J., Neumann, F. J., & Kalusche, D. (2007). Small or Large Isolation Areas Around the Pulmonary Veins for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation?: Results From a Prospective Randomized Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.690578

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.