Cited by 333Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Long-term follow-up of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation using termination as a procedural endpoint

O'Neill, M. D., Wright, M., Knecht, S., Jais, P., Hocini, M., Takahashi, Y., Jonsson, A., Sacher, F. +9 more·2009·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has been performed with varying results using a combination of different techniques. Whether arrhythmia termination during ablation is associated with an improved clinical outcome is controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective study, 153 consecutive patients (56 +/- 10 years) underwent catheter ablation of persistent AF (25 +/- 33 months) using a stepwise approach with the desired procedural endpoint being AF termination. Repeat ablation was performed for patients with recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) after a 1 month blanking period. A minimum follow-up of 12 months with repeated Holter monitoring was performed. Atrial fibrillation was terminated in 130 patients (85%). There was a lower incidence of AF in those patients in whom AF was terminated during the index procedure compared with those who had not (5 vs. 39% P < 0.0001, mean follow-up 32 +/- 11 months). Seventy-nine patients underwent repeat procedures: 64/130 in the termination group (6 AF, 58 AT) and 15 in the non-termination group (9 AF, 7 AT). After repeat ablation, sinus rhythm was maintained in 95% in whom AF was terminated compared with 52% in those in whom AF could not be terminated. CONCLUSION: Procedural termination of long-lasting AF by catheter ablation alone is associated with an improved outcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp063

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Elayi IS, Arruda M, Di Biase L, Ching CK, Patel D, Kanj MH, Fahmy TS, Khan MN, Meulet JE, Barrett C, Philips KP, Wasson S, Civello KC, Bailey SM, Zakaib J, Callahan T, Cummings JE, Burkhardt JD, Martin DO, Bhargava M, Dresing T, Schweikert RA, Wazni OM, Saliba W, Natale A. Is atrial fibrillation termination mode during ablation for permanent AF a predictor of long term maintenance of sinus rhythm? (Abstract). Heart Rhythm 2007;4:S320.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Neill, M. D., Wright, M., Knecht, S., Jais, P., Hocini, M., Takahashi, Y., Jonsson, A., Sacher, F., Matsuo, S., Lim, K. T., Arantes, L., Derval, N., Lellouche, N., Nault, I., Bordachar, P., Clementy, J., & Haissaguerre, M.
Affiliations
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque (FR)
Corresponding author
Wright, M.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2009-03-08
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
1105-1112
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2130677268
Cited by
333
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 54
FWCI
25.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
persistent atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, procedural endpoint, arrhythmia termination, repeat ablation, atrial tachycardia, long-term outcomes, sinus rhythm maintenance
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Reoperation, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review