Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Complex Electrograms

Open access
Oral, Hakan, Chugh, Aman, Good, Eric, Wimmer, Alan, Dey, Sujoya, Gadeela, Nitesh, Sankaran, Sundar, Crawford, Thomas, Sarrazin, Jean F., Kuhne, Michael, Chalfoun, Nagib, Wells, Darryl, Frederick, Melissa, Fortino, Jackie, Benloucif-Moore, Suzanne, Jongnarangsin, Krit, Pelosi, Frank, Bogun, Frank, Morady, Fred·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) guided by complex fractionated atrial electrograms has been reported to eliminate AF in a large proportion of patients. However, only a small number of patients with chronic AF have been included in previous studies. Methods and Results— In 100 patients (mean age, 57±11 years) with chronic AF, radiofrequency ablation was performed to target complex fractionated atrial electrograms at the pulmonary vein ostial and antral areas, various regions of the left atrium, and the coronary sinus until AF terminated or all identified complex fractionated atrial electrograms were eliminated. Ablation sites consisted of ≥1 pulmonary vein in 46% of patients; the left atrial septum, roof, or anterior wall in all; and the coronary sinus in 55%. During 14±7 months of follow-up after a single ablation procedure, 33% of patients were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs, 38% had AF, 17% had both AF and atrial flutter, 9% had persistent atrial flutter, and 3% had paroxysmal AF on antiarrhythmic drugs. A second ablation procedure was performed in 44% of patients. Pulmonary vein tachycardia was found in all patients in both previously targeted and nontargeted pulmonary veins. There were multiple macroreentrant circuits in the majority of patients with atrial flutter. At 13±7 months after the last ablation procedure, 57% of patients were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs, 32% had persistent AF, 6% had paroxysmal AF, and 5% had atrial flutter. Conclusions— Modest short-term efficacy is achievable with radiofrequency ablation of chronic AF guided by complex fractionated atrial electrograms, but only after a second ablation procedure in >40% of patients. Rapid activity in the pulmonary veins and multiple macroreentrant circuits are common mechanisms of recurrent atrial arrhythmias.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.691386

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Authors
Oral, H., Chugh, A., Good, E., Wimmer, A., Dey, S., Gadeela, N., Sankaran, S., Crawford, T., Sarrazin, J. F., Kuhne, M., Chalfoun, N., Wells, D., Frederick, M., Fortino, J., Benloucif-Moore, S., Jongnarangsin, K., Pelosi, F., Bogun, F., & Morady, F.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-05-22
Volume
115
Issue
20
Pages
2606-2612
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2096879331
Cited by
376
References
0
FWCI
28.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Complex Electrograms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.691386
The paper
Oral, H., Chugh, A., Good, E., Wimmer, A., Dey, S., Gadeela, N., Sankaran, S., Crawford, T., Sarrazin, J. F., Kuhne, M., Chalfoun, N., Wells, D., Frederick, M., Fortino, J., Benloucif-Moore, S., Jongnarangsin, K., Pelosi, F., Bogun, F., & Morady, F. (2007). Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Complex Electrograms. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.691386

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.