Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,016

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Percutaneous Transarterial Aortic Valve Replacement in Selected High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis

Open access
Webb, John G., Pasupati, Sanjeevan, Humphries, Karin, Thompson, Christopher, Altwegg, Lukas, Moss, Robert, Sinhal, Ajay, Carere, Ronald G., Munt, Brad, Ricci, Donald, Ye, Jian, Cheung, Anson, Lichtenstein, Sam V.·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Percutaneous aortic valve replacement represents an endovascular alternative to conventional open heart surgery without the need for sternotomy, aortotomy, or cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods and Results— Transcatheter implantation of a balloon-expandable stent valve using a femoral arterial approach was attempted in 50 symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis in whom there was a consensus that the risks of conventional open heart surgery were very high. Valve implantation was successful in 86% of patients. Intraprocedural mortality was 2%. Discharge home occurred at a median of 5 days (interquartile range, 4 to 13). Mortality at 30 days was 12% in patients in whom the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation risk score was 28%. With experience, procedural success increased from 76% in the first 25 patients to 96% in the second 25 ( P =0.10), and 30-day mortality fell from 16% to 8% ( P =0.67). Successful valve replacement was associated with an increase in echocardiographic valve area from 0.6±0.2 to 1.7±0.4 cm 2 . Mild paravalvular regurgitation was common but was well tolerated. After valve insertion, there was a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction ( P <0.0001), mitral regurgitation ( P =0.01), and functional class ( P <0.0001). Improvement was maintained at 1 year. Structural valve deterioration was not observed with a median follow-up of 359 days. Conclusion— Percutaneous valve replacement may be an alternative to conventional open heart surgery in selected high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.698258

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,016

Metadata

Authors
Webb, J. G., Pasupati, S., Humphries, K., Thompson, C., Altwegg, L., Moss, R., Sinhal, A., Carere, R. G., Munt, B., Ricci, D., Ye, J., Cheung, A., & Lichtenstein, S. V.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-08-14
Volume
116
Issue
7
Pages
755-763
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2167332311
Cited by
1,016
References
2
FWCI
85.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percutaneous Transarterial Aortic Valve Replacement in Selected High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.698258
The paper
Webb, J. G., Pasupati, S., Humphries, K., Thompson, C., Altwegg, L., Moss, R., Sinhal, A., Carere, R. G., Munt, B., Ricci, D., Ye, J., Cheung, A., & Lichtenstein, S. V. (2007). Percutaneous Transarterial Aortic Valve Replacement in Selected High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.698258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.