Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utility of Cardiac Monitoring in Fetuses at Risk for Congenital Heart Block: The PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) Prospective Study

Friedman, Deborah M., Kim, Mimi Y., Copel, Joshua A., Davis, Claudine, Phoon, Colin K.L., Glickstein, Julie S., Buyon, Jill P.·2008·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Anti-SSA/Ro–associated third-degree congenital heart block is irreversible, prompting a search for early markers and effective therapy. Methods and Results— One hundred twenty-seven pregnant women with anti-SSA/Ro antibodies were enrolled; 95 completed an evaluable course in 98 pregnancies. The protocol included fetal echocardiograms performed weekly from 16 to 26 weeks’ gestation and biweekly from 26 to 34 weeks. PR intervals >150 ms were considered prolonged, consistent with first-degree block. Ninety-two fetuses had normal PR intervals. Neonatal lupus developed in 10 cases; 4 were neonatal lupus rash only. Three fetuses had third-degree block; none had a preceding abnormal PR interval, although in 2 fetuses >1 week elapsed between echocardiographic evaluations. Tricuspid regurgitation preceded third-degree block in 1 fetus, and an atrial echodensity preceded block in a second. Two fetuses had PR intervals >150 ms. Both were detected at or before 22 weeks, and each reversed within 1 week with 4 mg dexamethasone. The ECG of 1 additional newborn revealed a prolonged PR interval persistent at 3 years despite normal intervals throughout gestation. No first-degree block developed after a normal ECG at birth. Heart block occurred in 3 of 16 pregnancies (19%) in mothers with a previous child with congenital heart block and in 3 of 74 pregnancies (4%) in mothers without a previous child with congenital heart block or rash ( P =0.067). Conclusions— Prolongation of the PR interval was uncommon and did not precede more advanced block. There was a trend toward more congenital heart block in fetuses of women with previously affected offspring than those without previously affected offspring. Advanced block and cardiomyopathy can occur within 1 week of a normal echocardiogram without initial first-degree block. Echodensities and moderate/severe tricuspid regurgitation merit attention as early signs of injury.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.707661

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Friedman, D. M., Kim, M. Y., Copel, J. A., Davis, C., Phoon, C. K. L., Glickstein, J. S., & Buyon, J. P.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2008-01-29
Volume
117
Issue
4
Pages
485-493
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2097558397
Cited by
311
References
26
FWCI
17.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utility of Cardiac Monitoring in Fetuses at Risk for Congenital Heart Block: The PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.707661
The paper
Friedman, D. M., Kim, M. Y., Copel, J. A., Davis, C., Phoon, C. K. L., Glickstein, J. S., & Buyon, J. P. (2008). Utility of Cardiac Monitoring in Fetuses at Risk for Congenital Heart Block: The PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) Prospective Study. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.707661

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.