The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Hypertension Control in Diabetes Mellitus: The Effects of Collaborative and Proactive Health Communication
Open accessAbstract
Background— Communication between patients and clinicians using collaborative goals and treatment plans may overcome barriers to achieving hypertension control in routine diabetes mellitus care. We assessed the interrelation of patient–clinician communication factors to determine their independent associations with hypertension control in diabetes care. Methods and Results— We identified 566 older adults with diabetes mellitus and hypertension at the DeBakey VA Medical Center in Houston, Tex. Clinical and pharmacy data were collected, and a patient questionnaire was sent to all participants. A total of 212 individuals returned surveys. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of patient characteristics, self-management behaviors, and communication factors on hypertension control. Three communication factors had significant associations with hypertension control. Two factors, patients’ endorsement of a shared decision-making style (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.57) and proactive communication with one’s clinician about abnormal results of blood pressure self-monitoring (odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 3.26), had direct, independent associations in multivariate regression. Path analysis was used to investigate the direct and indirect effects of communication factors and hypertension control. Decision-making style (β=0.20, P <0.01) and proactive communication (β=0.50, P <0.0001) again demonstrated direct effects on hypertension control. A third factor, clinicians’ use of collaborative communication when setting treatment goals, had a total effect on hypertension control of 0.16 ( P <0.05) through its direct effects on decision-making style (β=0.28, P <0.001) and proactive communication (β=0.22, P <0.01). Conclusions— Three communication factors were found to have significant associations with hypertension control. Patient–clinician communication that facilitates collaborative blood pressure goals and patients’ input related to the progress of treatment may improve rates of hypertension control in diabetes care independent of medication adherence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
DEYO, R. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 · Cited by 10,452
Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J., & Bonomi, A. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 · Cited by 3,446
The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale.
Toobert, D. J., Hampson, S. E., & Glasgow, R. E. (2000) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.23.7.943 · Cited by 2,561
Phillips, L. S., Branch, W. T., Cook, C. B., Doyle, J. P., El-Kebbi, I. M., Gallina, D. L., Miller, C. D., Ziemer, D. C., & Barnes, C. S. (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-9-200111060-00012 · Cited by 1,370
Renders, C. M., Valk, G. D., Griffin, S. J., Wagner, E. H., Eijk van, J. T., & Assendelft, W. J. J. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.10.1821 · Cited by 1,066
Heisler, M., Bouknight, R. R., Hayward, R. A., Smith, D. M., & Kerr, E. A. (2002) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10905.x · Cited by 717
Translating what we have learned into practice
Glasgow, R. E., Goldstein, M. G., Ockene, J. K., & Pronk, N. P. (2004) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.019 · Cited by 239
Cited by
KDIGO 2024 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease
Stevens, P. E., Ahmed, S. B., Carrero, J. J., Foster, B., Francis, A., Hall, R. K., Herrington, W. G., Hill, G., Inker, L. A., Kazancıoğlu, R., et al. (2024) · Kidney International · doi:10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018 · Cited by 8,530
Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial – 2020
Barroso, W. K. S., Rodrigues, C. I. S., Bortolotto, L. A., Mota-Gomes, M. A., Brandão, A. A., Feitosa, A. D. D. M., Machado, C. A., Poli-de-Figueiredo, C. E., Amodeo, C., Mion, D., et al. (2021) · Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia · doi:10.36660/abc.20201238 · Cited by 1,068
Adherence in Hypertension: A Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Impact, and Management
Burnier, M., & Egan, B. M. (2019) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.313220 · Cited by 878
Community-Based Participatory Research From the Margin to the Mainstream: Are Researchers Prepared?
Horowitz, C. R., Robinson, M., & Seifer, S. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.729863 · Cited by 549
Naik, A. D., Palmer, N., Petersen, N. J., Street, R. L., Rao, R., Suarez-Almazor, M., & Haidet, P. (2011) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.70 · Cited by 176
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Naik, A. D., Kallen, M. A., Walder, A., & Street, R. L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2008-03-18
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1361-1368
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2028110552
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 26.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Hypertension Control in Diabetes Mellitus: The Effects of Collaborative and Proactive Health Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.724005
- The paper
- Naik, A. D., Kallen, M. A., Walder, A., & Street, R. L. (2008). Improving Hypertension Control in Diabetes Mellitus: The Effects of Collaborative and Proactive Health Communication. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.724005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.