Cited by 878Medication Adherence and ComplianceBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Adherence in Hypertension: A Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Impact, and Management

Burnier, Michel, Egan, Brent M.·2019·Circulation Research

Abstract

The global epidemic of hypertension is largely uncontrolled and hypertension remains the leading cause of noncommunicable disease deaths worldwide. Suboptimal adherence, which includes failure to initiate pharmacotherapy, to take medications as often as prescribed, and to persist on therapy long-term, is a well-recognized factor contributing to the poor control of blood pressure in hypertension. Several categories of factors including demographic, socioeconomic, concomitant medical-behavioral conditions, therapy-related, healthcare team and system-related factors, and patient factors are associated with nonadherence. Understanding the categories of factors contributing to nonadherence is useful in managing nonadherence. In patients at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, electronic and biochemical monitoring are useful for detecting nonadherence and for improving adherence. Increasing the availability and affordability of these more precise measures of adherence represent a future opportunity to realize more of the proven benefits of evidence-based medications. In the absence of new antihypertensive drugs, it is important that healthcare providers focus their attention on how to do better with the drugs they have. This is the reason why recent guidelines have emphasize the important need to address drug adherence as a major issue in hypertension management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.118.313220

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burnier, M., & Egan, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2019-03-29
Volume
124
Issue
7
Pages
1124-1140
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2943413777
Cited by
878
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 165 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 152 · 2022: 140 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
78.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
hypertension, medication adherence, non-compliance, blood pressure control, antihypertensive therapy, electronic monitoring, biochemical monitoring, cardiovascular risk, socioeconomic factors, patient factors
MeSH terms
Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hypertension, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review