Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 597

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST) Trial: A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure With STARFlex Septal Repair Implant to Resolve Refractory Migraine Headache

Dowson, Andrew, Mullen, Michael J., Peatfield, Richard, Muir, Keith, Khan, Arif Anis, Wells, Christopher, Lipscombe, Susan L., Rees, Trevor, De Giovanni, Joseph V., Morrison, W. Lindsay, Hildick-Smith, David, Elrington, Giles, Hillis, W. Stewart, Malik, Iqbal S., Rickards, Anthony·2008·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is prevalent in patients with migraine with aura. Observational studies show that PFO closure resulted in migraine cessation or improvement in ≈80% of such patients. We investigated the effects of PFO closure for migraine in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Methods and Results— Patients who suffered from migraine with aura, experienced frequent migraine attacks, had previously failed ≥2 classes of prophylactic treatments, and had moderate or large right-to-left shunts consistent with the presence of a PFO were randomized to transcatheter PFO closure with the STARFlex implant or to a sham procedure. Patients were followed up for 6 months. The primary efficacy end point was cessation of migraine headache 91 to 180 days after the procedure. In total, 163 of 432 patients (38%) had right-to-left shunts consistent with a moderate or large PFO. One hundred forty-seven patients were randomized. No significant difference was observed in the primary end point of migraine headache cessation between implant and sham groups (3 of 74 versus 3 of 73, respectively; P =0.51). Secondary end points also were not achieved. On exploratory analysis, excluding 2 outliers, the implant group demonstrated a greater reduction in total migraine headache days ( P =0.027). As expected, the implant arm experienced more procedural serious adverse events. All events were transient. Conclusions— This trial confirmed the high prevalence of right-to-left shunts in patients with migraine with aura. Although no significant effect was found for primary or secondary end points, the exploratory analysis supports further investigation. The robust design of this study has served as the model for larger trials that are currently underway in the United States and Europe.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.727271

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 597

Metadata

Authors
Dowson, A., Mullen, M. J., Peatfield, R., Muir, K., Khan, A. A., Wells, C., Lipscombe, S. L., Rees, T., De Giovanni, J. V., Morrison, W. L., Hildick-Smith, D., Elrington, G., Hillis, W. S., Malik, I. S., & Rickards, A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2008-03-18
Volume
117
Issue
11
Pages
1397-1404
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2168439673
Cited by
597
References
4
FWCI
50.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST) Trial: A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure With STARFlex Septal Repair Implant to Resolve Refractory Migraine Headache. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.727271
The paper
Dowson, A., Mullen, M. J., Peatfield, R., Muir, K., Khan, A. A., Wells, C., Lipscombe, S. L., Rees, T., De Giovanni, J. V., Morrison, W. L., Hildick-Smith, D., Elrington, G., Hillis, W. S., Malik, I. S., & Rickards, A. (2008). Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST) Trial: A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure With STARFlex Septal Repair Implant to Resolve Refractory Migraine Headache. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.727271

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.