Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Therapeutic International Normalized Ratio: Comparison of Strategies of Anticoagulation Management in the Periprocedural Period

Open access
Wazni, Oussama M., Beheiry, Salwa, Fahmy, Tamer, Barrett, Conor, Hao, Steven, Patel, Dimpi, Di Biase, Luigi, Martin, David O., Kanj, Mohamed, Arruda, Mauricio, Cummings, Jennifer, Schweikert, Robert, Saliba, Walid, Natale, Andrea·2007·Circulation

Abstract

Background— The best approach to management of anticoagulation before and after atrial fibrillation ablation is not known. Methods and Results— We compared outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation. Early in our practice, warfarin was stopped 3 days before ablation, and a transesophageal echocardiogram was performed to rule out clot. Enoxaparin, initially 1 mg/kg twice daily (group 1) and then 0.5 mg/kg twice daily (group 2), was used to “bridge” patients after ablation. Subsequently, warfarin was continued to maintain the international normalized ratio between 2 and 3.5 (group 3). Minor bleeding was defined as hematoma that did not require intervention. Major bleeding was defined as either cardiac tamponade, hematoma that required intervention, or bleeding that required blood transfusion. Pulmonary vein ablation was performed in 355 patients (group 1=105, group 2=100, and group 3=150). More patients had spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in groups 1 and 2. One patient in group 1 had an ischemic stroke compared with 2 patients in group 2 and no patients in group 3. In group 1, 23 patients had minor bleeding, 9 had major bleeding, and 1 had pericardial effusion but no tamponade. In group 2, 19 patients had minor bleeding, and 2 patients developed symptomatic pericardial effusion with need for pericardiocentesis 1 week after discharge. In group 3, 8 patients developed minor bleeding, and 1 patient developed pericardial effusion with no tamponade. Conclusions— Continuation of warfarin throughout pulmonary vein ablation without administration of enoxaparin is safe and efficacious. This strategy can be an alternative to bridging with enoxaparin or heparin in the periprocedural period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.107.727784

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Wazni, O. M., Beheiry, S., Fahmy, T., Barrett, C., Hao, S., Patel, D., Di Biase, L., Martin, D. O., Kanj, M., Arruda, M., Cummings, J., Schweikert, R., Saliba, W., & Natale, A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2007-11-27
Volume
116
Issue
22
Pages
2531-2534
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2079348350
Cited by
249
References
0
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Therapeutic International Normalized Ratio: Comparison of Strategies of Anticoagulation Management in the Periprocedural Period. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.727784
The paper
Wazni, O. M., Beheiry, S., Fahmy, T., Barrett, C., Hao, S., Patel, D., Di Biase, L., Martin, D. O., Kanj, M., Arruda, M., Cummings, J., Schweikert, R., Saliba, W., & Natale, A. (2007). Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With Therapeutic International Normalized Ratio: Comparison of Strategies of Anticoagulation Management in the Periprocedural Period. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.727784

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.