The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-Term Benefit of Postconditioning
Open accessAbstract
Background— We previously demonstrated that ischemic postconditioning decreases creatine kinase release, a surrogate marker for infarct size, in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Our objective was to determine whether ischemic postconditioning could afford (1) a persistent infarct size limitation and (2) an improved recovery of myocardial contractile function several months after infarction. Methods and Results— Patients presenting within 6 hours of the onset of chest pain, with suspicion for a first ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, and for whom the clinical decision was made to treat with percutaneous coronary intervention, were eligible for enrollment. After reperfusion by direct stenting, 38 patients were randomly assigned to a control (no intervention; n=21) or postconditioned group (repeated inflation and deflation of the angioplasty balloon; n=17). Infarct size was assessed both by cardiac enzyme release during early reperfusion and by 201 thallium single photon emission computed tomography at 6 months after acute myocardial infarction. At 1 year, global and regional contractile function was evaluated by echocardiography. At 6 months after acute myocardial infarction, single photon emission computed tomography rest-redistribution index (a surrogate for infarct size) averaged 11.8±10.3% versus 19.5±13.3% in the postconditioned versus control group ( P =0.04), in agreement with the significant reduction in creatine kinase and troponin I release observed in the postconditioned versus control group (−40% and −47%, respectively). At 1 year, the postconditioned group exhibited a 7% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction compared with control ( P =0.04). Conclusions— Postconditioning affords persistent infarct size reduction and improves long-term functional recovery in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a neglected therapeutic target
Hausenloy, D. J., & Yellon, D. M. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci62874 · Cited by 2,357
Mesenchymal stem cell exosome: a novel stem cell-based therapy for cardiovascular disease
Lai, R. C., Chen, T. S., & Lim, S. K. (2011) · Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.2217/rme.11.35 · Cited by 553
Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Stroke
Nour, M., Scalzo, F., & Liebeskind, D. S. (2012) · Interventional Neurology · doi:10.1159/000353125 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Thibault, H., Piot, C., Staat, P., Bontemps, L., Sportouch, C., Rioufol, G., Cung, T. T., Bonnefoy, E., Angoulvant, D., Aupetit, J.-F., Finet, G., André-Fouët, X., Macia, J. C., Raczka, F., Rossi, R., Itti, R., Kirkorian, G., Derumeaux, G., & Ovize, M.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2008-02-26
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1037-1044
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2081787098
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Benefit of Postconditioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circulationaha.107.729780
- The paper
- Thibault, H., Piot, C., Staat, P., Bontemps, L., Sportouch, C., Rioufol, G., Cung, T. T., Bonnefoy, E., Angoulvant, D., Aupetit, J.-F., Finet, G., André-Fouët, X., Macia, J. C., Raczka, F., Rossi, R., Itti, R., Kirkorian, G., Derumeaux, G., & Ovize, M. (2008). Long-Term Benefit of Postconditioning. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.729780
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.